9911796707
|
Home
Forgot password New User/ Regiser ⇒ Register to get Live Demo
2018 (4) TMI 1057 - AT - Income TaxUnexplained investment in property u/s 69 - Held that - As per CIT(A) Assessee had not filed his return of income from A.Y 2007-08 - though Assessee has not filed return of income from A.Y 2007-08 onwards yet his submission of maintaining books of accounts 90, 000/- from his savings bank account and it was used for purchase of KVPs it has not been controverted by Revenue - we are of view that credit to the extent of 90, 000/- be granted and the addition is therefore restricted to the balance amount of 80, 000/-. - Decided partly in favour of assessee.
Issues Involved:
1. Addition on the ground of unexplained investment in property under Section 69. 2. Addition for possession of silver articles under Section 69A. 3. Addition on the ground of unexplained investment in Kisan Vikas Patra (KVPs) under Section 69. Issue-wise Detailed Analysis: 1. Unexplained Investment in Property: The Assessee purchased property for ?4,00,500, with evidence of payment for only ?2,00,000. The Assessing Officer (AO) treated the remaining ?2,00,500 as unexplained investment under Section 69. The Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) [CIT(A)] partially upheld this by accepting cheque payments totaling ?2,63,843 but found no credible evidence for cash payments of ?1,36,657, thus retaining this amount as unexplained. The Tribunal found no reason to interfere with CIT(A)’s findings, noting the lack of contemporaneous evidence and credibility of the Assessee's cash book. Therefore, the ground raised by the Assessee was dismissed. 2. Possession of Silver Articles: During a search, gold jewelry and silver utensils were found. The AO added the value of these items as unexplained investment under Section 69A, totaling ?25,95,507. The CIT(A) accepted the Assessee's explanation for the gold jewelry based on CBDT Instruction No. 1916, considering it within permissible limits and thus explained. However, for the silver utensils weighing 10.595 kg valued at ?2,57,460, the CIT(A) did not find the Assessee’s explanation credible and retained this amount as unexplained. The Tribunal, noting that the inventory of silver was made in the name of the Assessee’s wife and no addition was made in her assessment, concluded that no addition in the hands of the Assessee was justified. Thus, this ground was allowed in favor of the Assessee. 3. Unexplained Investment in KVPs: KVPs amounting to ?8,51,500 were found, with ?1,70,000 invested during the year. The AO added this as unexplained investment under Section 69 due to lack of evidence for the opening cash balance and the Assessee not filing returns from 2006-07 onwards. The CIT(A) upheld this, citing the unreliability of the Assessee’s cash book. The Tribunal, however, accepted the Assessee’s claim of withdrawing ?90,000 from a savings bank account and used for KVPs, thus granting credit for this amount and restricting the addition to ?80,000. Consequently, this ground was partly allowed. Conclusion: The Tribunal partly allowed the appeal, dismissing the ground related to unexplained investment in property, allowing the ground related to silver articles, and partly allowing the ground related to KVPs by restricting the addition to ?80,000. The order was pronounced on April 9, 2018.
|
