9911796707
|
Home
Forgot password New User/ Regiser ⇒ Register to get Live Demo
2018 (6) TMI 984 - AT - Central ExciseRectification of Mistake application - Held that - There is a mistake in the preamble of the order in mentioning the order number. Accordingly, in the preamble, the appeal arising out of Order-in-Appeal No. AV(119)/95/2013 dated 25.4.2013 passed by the Commissioner of Customs & Central Excise (Appeals), Aurangabad is corrected and may be read as Order-in-original No. 34/CEX/COMMR/2013 dated 18.10.2013 passed by the Commissioner of Customs & Central Excise, Aurangabad - ROM application allowed.
The application was for rectification of a mistake in the order dated 30.11.2017. The correct order number should be "Order-in-Original No. 34/CEX/COMMR/2013 dated 18.10.2013." The correction was made, and the ROM application was allowed. (Judgement: Appellate Tribunal CESTAT MUMBAI, Citation: 2018 (6) TMI 984 - CESTAT MUMBAI)
|
