9911796707
|
Home
Forgot password New User/ Regiser ⇒ Register to get Live Demo
2019 (1) TMI 152 - AT - Income TaxTPA - determination of arms length price(ALP) u/s 92C - commission chargeable by the assessee from its AE on international transaction entered into u/s 92B with its associated enterprises (AE) - Held that - Tribunal for AY 2012-13 in assessee s own case has computed ALP of its international transaction with its same AE namely PSPL , Singapore of providing corporate guarantee on loans availed by its AE wherein ALP of commission on said corporate guarantee was determined at 0.5%. The tribunal while passing aforesaid orders dated 06.06.2018 for AY 2012-13 followed its decision for AY 2009-10. One us namely Judicial Member was member of the division bench of the tribunal who passed the aforesaid orders for AY 2012-13 . No reasons to deviate from aforesaid orders of the tribunal for AY 2009-10 and 2012-13 taking a consistent view and following the rules of consistency as laid down by Hon ble Supreme Court in the case of Radhasoami Satsang v. CIT 1991 (11) TMI 2 - SUPREME COURT we determine ALP of corporate guarantee commission @0.5% on international transaction of providing corporate guarantee by the assessee to its AE namely PSPL, Singapore for availing loans - decided partly in favour of assessee
Issues:
Determination of arms length price (ALP) under section 92C of the Income-tax Act, 1961 for commission chargeable by the assessee from its associated enterprises (AE) on international transactions. Detailed Analysis: 1. Issue of ALP determination for commission chargeable by the assessee from its AE: - The primary issue in this appeal revolves around the determination of the arms length price (ALP) under section 92C of the Income-tax Act, 1961 for the commission charged by the assessee from its associated enterprise (AE) on international transactions. The Transfer Pricing Officer (TPO) proposed an adjustment of &8377;1,54,82,741 in the ALP of the international transaction involving the provision of a corporate guarantee by the assessee to its AE based in Singapore. The TPO's adjustment led to the addition of the same amount to the assessee's income as determined by the Assessing Officer (AO) in the assessment order. The assessee contested this addition before the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) for the assessment year 2010-11 but was unsuccessful. The CIT(A) relied on the decision for the previous year, AY 2009-10, and dismissed the appeal based on the rule of consistency. 2. Consistency in ALP determination for corporate guarantee commission: - The issue of consistency in determining the ALP for corporate guarantee commissions provided by the assessee to its AE was also highlighted in the judgment. In a previous appeal for AY 2009-10, the ITAT Mumbai had computed the ALP at 0.5% of the corporate guarantee given by the assessee to its AE in Singapore. This decision was upheld by the ITAT, and the ALP was determined at 0.5% per annum. Subsequently, in another appeal for AY 2012-13, the ITAT again computed the ALP at 0.5% for the same transaction. The tribunal, following the rule of consistency and the principles laid down by the Hon'ble Supreme Court, determined the ALP of the corporate guarantee commission at 0.5% for the international transaction involving the provision of a corporate guarantee by the assessee to its AE in Singapore for availing loans. 3. Judicial decisions and application of ALP rate: - The judgment referred to various judicial decisions where the ALP adjustments were upheld, emphasizing the need for compensation by the AE for the benefits received from the corporate guarantee provided by the assessee. The tribunal, in line with its previous decisions and the principles established in relevant case laws, determined the ALP of the corporate guarantee commission at 0.5% on the international transaction. This approach was consistent with the earlier rulings and aimed to ensure uniformity in the ALP determination process for similar transactions involving corporate guarantees. By analyzing the issues related to the determination of arms length price for the commission charged by the assessee from its associated enterprises on international transactions, the judgment highlighted the significance of consistency in ALP determination and the application of established principles and judicial decisions in resolving transfer pricing disputes.
|
