Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding
  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram

Home Case Index All Cases Customs Customs + AT Customs - 2019 (5) TMI AT This

  • Login
  • Cases Cited
  • Summary

Forgot password       New User/ Regiser

⇒ Register to get Live Demo



 

2019 (5) TMI 1422 - AT - Customs


Issues:
Redetermination of value of imported goods misdeclared as "Heavy Melting Scrap" under Section 111(m) of the Customs Act, 1962 with confiscation, redemption, and penalty.

Analysis:
The appellant challenged the order of the Commissioner of Customs (Imports) regarding the redetermination of the value of imported goods misdeclared as "Heavy Melting Scrap." The appellant imported a consignment of HMS scrap, which was found to be primarily steel plates of prime quality camouflaged with shredded scrap and stamping waste scrap. The value of the goods was enhanced to ?22,69,826 from the declared value of ?15,43,506.20. The appellant admitted the misdeclaration and accepted the classification and value of the goods as per Rule 9 of the Valuation Rule, 2007, leading to the imposition of basic Customs duty at 10%. Confiscation under Section 111(m) and redemption of goods upon payment of fine along with a penalty under Section 112(a) were also ordered. The appellant contested the order, citing cases and arguing against the invocation of Rule 9 without relying on similar imports.

During the appeal, the appellant argued that the goods were purchased on high sea sale basis and there was no mala fide intention in the misdeclaration. However, the Authorised Representative for the respondent-department supported the Commissioner's order, emphasizing the examination process and the misdeclaration established by the valuation. The Tribunal reviewed the case record and found that the appellant admitted the misdeclaration, and the Commissioner's valuation under Rule 9 was justified based on the international market price of similar goods. The Tribunal upheld the Commissioner's order, dismissing the appeal.

The appellant contended that no act or omission justified confiscation and penalty under the Customs Act. However, the Commissioner's order and case record revealed the misdeclaration and camouflaging of goods, leading to confiscation under Sections 111(m) and 119. The appellant failed to provide a satisfactory explanation, resulting in the imposition of penalties under Section 112(a). The Tribunal found no irregularity in the Commissioner's order and confirmed the dismissal of the appeal, upholding the original order passed by the Commissioner of Customs (Imports), JNCH, Nhava Sheva.

In conclusion, the Tribunal dismissed the appeal and confirmed the order of the Commissioner of Customs, upholding the redetermination of value, confiscation, redemption, and penalty imposed on the imported goods misdeclared as "Heavy Melting Scrap."

 

 

 

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates