Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding
  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram

Home Case Index All Cases Income Tax Income Tax + HC Income Tax - 2019 (7) TMI HC This

  • Login
  • Cases Cited
  • Referred In
  • Summary

Forgot password       New User/ Regiser

⇒ Register to get Live Demo



 

2019 (7) TMI 1393 - HC - Income Tax


Issues involved:
1. Condonation of delay in re-filing the appeal.
2. Justification of quashing assessment order under Section 153A of the Income Tax Act.
3. Interpretation of incriminating material in relation to share application money.
4. Application of legal principles from previous court decisions.

Issue 1: Condonation of delay in re-filing the appeal

The High Court condoned a delay of 63 days in re-filing the appeal, allowing the application. The delay was explained in the application, leading to its condonation.

Issue 2: Justification of quashing assessment order under Section 153A of the Income Tax Act

The Revenue appealed against the ITAT's order quashing the assessment order under Section 153A for the AY 2006-07. The main question was whether the ITAT was justified in quashing the assessment order due to the lack of incriminating material regarding the addition made on account of share application money during the search operation. The ITAT's decision was based on the absence of incriminating material related to the share capital, leading to the addition being deemed unjustified.

Issue 3: Interpretation of incriminating material in relation to share application money

The search operation under Section 132 of the Act led to the assessment order where an addition was made to the Assessee's income due to share application money. The Assessee's appeal was allowed by the CIT (A) based on the lack of evidence to support a different view. The ITAT accepted the Assessee's plea that no incriminating document related to the addition on share capital was found during the search, satisfying the jurisdictional requirement of Section 153A of the Act.

Issue 4: Application of legal principles from previous court decisions

The Revenue challenged the ITAT's decision based on the judgment in CIT v. Kabul Chawla, emphasizing the need for incriminating material to justify additions. The Supreme Court's dismissal of the Revenue's appeal against the Kabul Chawla decision was noted. The Court referred to the decision in CIT v. Singhad Technical Education Society, highlighting the requirement for seized material to have a direct correlation with the assessment years in question. The Court upheld the ITAT's decision, stating that the absence of incriminating material related to the addition on share capital rendered the addition unjustified, in line with the jurisdictional requirements of Section 153A of the Act.

In conclusion, the High Court dismissed the appeal as no substantial question of law arose, affirming the ITAT's decision regarding the quashing of the assessment order under Section 153A of the Income Tax Act for the AY 2006-07.

 

 

 

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates