2019 (9) TMI 451 - HC - GST

Rectification of mistake - inadvertent mistake - it is pointed out that inadvertently, the name of Mr. Bharat Raichandani is not indicated in the appearance for the petitioner along with the learned counsel Shri Aditya R. Parikh - HELD THAT - The Registry shall add the name of Mr. Bharat Raichandani along with Mr. Aditya Parikh as the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner in our order - The necessary addition shall be effected and a fresh writ of the order shall be issued.

Summary

Issues: Appearance of counsel in the court order.

Analysis:
The judgment delivered by the Gujarat High Court pertains to a note for speaking to minutes highlighting the inadvertent exclusion of Mr. Bharat Raichandani's name in the appearance for the petitioner, along with Mr. Aditya R. Parikh. The Court directed the Registry to rectify the error by adding Mr. Bharat Raichandani's name as counsel for the petitioner in the court order dated 22nd August 2019. The Court emphasized the importance of accurately reflecting the appearance of all counsels involved in the case to ensure procedural correctness and clarity in the records. The directive aimed at issuing a fresh writ of the order with the necessary addition to accurately represent the legal representation in the case. The judgment underscores the significance of precise documentation and the inclusion of all relevant counsels in court orders to maintain transparency and procedural accuracy in legal proceedings.