Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding
  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram

Home Case Index All Cases Income Tax Income Tax + HC Income Tax - 2020 (7) TMI HC This

  • Login
  • Cases Cited
  • Referred In
  • Summary

Forgot password       New User/ Regiser

⇒ Register to get Live Demo



 

2020 (7) TMI 664 - HC - Income Tax


Issues:
Interpretation of Section 80P of the Income Tax Act, 1961 for deduction eligibility.

Analysis:
The High Court of Madras heard appeals filed by the assessee challenging the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal's order regarding the entitlement to deduction under Section 80P of the Income Tax Act, 1961 for the assessment year 2011-12. The substantial question of law revolved around whether the appellant was entitled to the deduction under Section 80P. The court considered the case of a Cooperative Society engaged in banking activities to determine eligibility for the deduction.

The court referred to a similar case decided by the Division Bench of the same court, where it was held that an 'associate member' is also considered a 'member' as per the Cooperative Societies Act. The court emphasized that for a cooperative society to qualify for relief under Section 80P, it must be engaged in providing credit facilities to its members. The court highlighted the importance of meeting the description of a society providing credit facilities to members to avail of the benefits under Section 80P.

Additionally, the court discussed the insertion of Sub-Section (4) to Section 80P by the Finance Act, 2006, which clarified that the deduction would not be admissible to a cooperative bank. However, primary agricultural credit societies or primary cooperative agriculture and rural development banks would still be eligible for the deduction. The court reiterated the definitions of 'members' and 'associate members' under the Tamil Nadu Cooperative Societies Act and emphasized that the Assessing Officer erred in not granting relief to the assessee society, as confirmed by the CIT (A) and the Tribunal.

In conclusion, the court dismissed the tax case appeals, stating that the substantial questions of law were answered against the Revenue. The court found the judgment applicable to the present case and allowed the Tax Case Appeals, answering the Substantial Questions of Law in favor of the assessee.

 

 

 

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates