Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding
  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram

Home Case Index All Cases Income Tax Income Tax + AT Income Tax - 2020 (9) TMI AT This

  • Login
  • Summary

Forgot password       New User/ Regiser

⇒ Register to get Live Demo



 

2020 (9) TMI 241 - AT - Income Tax


Issues:
- Recognition u/s.80G(5) of the Income-tax Act, 1961 denied by CIT(Exemption), Pune
- Requirement of registration u/s.12AA of the Act for eligibility under section 80G
- Examination of genuineness of activities for registration u/s.80G
- Necessity of financial statements and evidence of expenditure for registration u/s.80G
- Remittal of the matter for fresh decision by CIT(Exemption)

The judgment pertains to an appeal against the denial of recognition u/s.80G(5) of the Income-tax Act, 1961 by the CIT(Exemption), Pune. The appellant, a company incorporated under section 8 of the Companies Act, 1956, had applied for recognition u/s.80G after being granted registration u/s.12AA. The CIT(E) found discrepancies in the information provided by the appellant, noting the absence of proof regarding activities carried out and expenditure incurred. The appellant's claim of conducting research in a sanctuary was supported by limited evidence. The CIT(E) refused registration under section 80G due to the lack of evidence of expenditure in financial statements. The appeal was brought before the Tribunal.

The Tribunal analyzed the legal provisions under section 80G(5) and rule 11AA, emphasizing the requirement for an institution or fund to be registered u/s.12AA before seeking approval u/s.80G. The Tribunal clarified that registration u/s.12AA does not preclude the examination of activities for registration u/s.80G. It highlighted the necessity of satisfying conditions under section 80G(5)(i) after registration u/s.12AA, followed by an examination of activities for registration u/s.80G. The Tribunal rejected the argument that registration u/s.12AA automatically leads to registration u/s.80G, stating that the process must be initiated separately.

Regarding the specific case, the Tribunal noted that the appellant had no activities or expenditure reflected in the Profit and loss account for the year ending 31-03-2018. The appellant applied for recognition u/s.80G in 2019, with the impugned order issued in August 2019. The appellant claimed that accounts for 2019 were being prepared and revealed donations received and expenditure incurred. As these details were not available during the initial assessment, the Tribunal remitted the matter to the CIT(E) for a fresh decision, considering the updated financial statements for 2019. The appellant was granted a hearing opportunity before any final decision.

In conclusion, the Tribunal allowed the appeal for statistical purposes, setting aside the initial order and instructing a reevaluation based on the updated financial information. The judgment highlighted the importance of fulfilling registration requirements under section 80G and providing evidence of activities and expenditure for successful registration under the Income-tax Act.

 

 

 

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates