Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding
  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram

Home Case Index All Cases GST GST + AAAR GST - 2020 (12) TMI AAAR This

  • Login
  • Cases Cited
  • Referred In
  • Summary

Forgot password       New User/ Regiser

⇒ Register to get Live Demo



 

2020 (12) TMI 1087 - AAAR - GST


Issues Involved:
1. Classification of Kerala State Electricity Board Ltd. (KSEB) under the categories of Central Government, State Government, Union Territory, local authority, Governmental Authority, or Government Entity.
2. Eligibility of concessional GST rate for the civil works of Pazhassi Sagar Small Hydro Electric Project.
3. Applicability of concessional SGST rate in line with CGST provisions.

Issue-wise Detailed Analysis:

1. Classification of Kerala State Electricity Board Ltd. (KSEB):

The appellant argued that KSEB qualifies as a Governmental Authority, which would make it eligible for a concessional GST rate. However, the judgment clarified that KSEB, being a company incorporated under the Companies Act, 1956, with more than 90% participation by the Government of Kerala, does not fall under the definition of "Governmental Authority" as per Notification No. 12/2017-Central Tax (Rate) dated 28.06.2017. Instead, KSEB qualifies as a "Government Entity" under Para 2(zfa) of the same notification, as it is set up by the State Government to carry out functions entrusted to it.

2. Eligibility of Concessional GST Rate for Civil Works:

The appellant sought a concessional GST rate of 6% for the civil works of the Pazhassi Sagar Small Hydro Electric Project under Sl. No. 3(iii)(b) or 3(vi) of Notification No. 11/2017-Central Tax (Rate) dated 28.06.2017. The judgment examined whether the works contract services provided to KSEB could be classified as works predominantly for use other than commerce, industry, or any other business or profession. It was determined that KSEB's primary function is the commercial activity of generating, transmitting, and distributing electricity, as evidenced by the Electricity Act, 2003, and the Memorandum of Association of KSEB. Therefore, the civil works do not meet the criteria for the concessional rate under Sl. No. 3(vi)(a).

Additionally, the work order for the civil works of the small hydroelectric project was not considered as civil work for a canal, dam, or other irrigation works, which would have qualified for the concessional rate under Sl. No. 3(iii)(b).

3. Applicability of Concessional SGST Rate:

Given that the conditions for the concessional CGST rate were not met, the judgment concluded that the appellant is also not eligible for the concessional SGST rate of 6% under Notification SRO 370/2017 dated 30.06.2017. The State GST provisions are pari materia with the CGST statutory provisions.

Conclusion:

The appellate authority upheld the Advance Ruling Authority's decision, confirming that the concessional rate of 6% CGST and SGST under Sl. No. 3(iii) or 3(vi) of Notification No. 11/2017-Central Tax (Rate) dated 28.06.2017 and SRO 370/2017 respectively, is not applicable for the works contract services supplied by the appellant to KSEB as per the specified work order. The appeal was dismissed, and the original ruling was maintained.

 

 

 

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates