Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding
  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram

Home Case Index All Cases Insolvency and Bankruptcy Insolvency and Bankruptcy + Tri Insolvency and Bankruptcy - 2021 (5) TMI Tri This

  • Login
  • Cases Cited
  • Referred In
  • Summary

Forgot password       New User/ Regiser

⇒ Register to get Live Demo



 

2021 (5) TMI 18 - Tri - Insolvency and Bankruptcy


Issues involved:
1. Eligibility of the applicant to submit the Resolution Plan in the name of the Corporate Debtor.
2. Eligibility of the applicant to submit the Resolution Plan in view of the Government of India Gazette Notification dated 26th June, 2020.

Issue 1: Eligibility of the applicant to submit the Resolution Plan in the name of the Corporate Debtor:

The applicant, a promoter of the Corporate Debtor, sought relief under Section 60(5) of Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016, and Rule 11 of NCLT Rules. The applicant requested the respondent to accept their Expression of Interest as a Prospective Resolution Applicant under Section 240A of IBC, emphasizing that the Corporate Debtor is a deemed MSME. The applicant argued that they should not be required to meet the eligibility criterion of a minimum tangible net worth of ?10 crores. The respondent, however, stated that the applicant did not meet the eligibility criteria and failed to rectify the deficiency despite being given an opportunity. The Committee of Creditors did not agree to waive the eligibility criteria for the applicant. The Tribunal considered whether the applicant could submit the Resolution Plan in the name of the Corporate Debtor.

Issue 2: Eligibility of the applicant to submit the Resolution Plan in view of the Government of India Gazette Notification dated 26th June, 2020:

The applicant claimed that as per the Gazette Notification No. SO 2119-E dated 26th June, 2020, the revised MSME criteria would classify them as a micro, small, or medium enterprise based on investment and turnover limits. The Resolution Professional confirmed that the Corporate Debtor qualified as an MSME under the revised norms. However, the notification was issued after the initiation of the Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process (CIRP) due to the COVID-19 pandemic. The Resolution Professional expressed readiness to accept the Resolution Plan from the applicant if directed by the Tribunal. The Tribunal referred to a decision by NCLAT emphasizing that if the Corporate Debtor is an MSME, the Promoters need not compete with other Resolution Applicants to regain control.

In conclusion, the Tribunal disposed of the application by directing the applicant to submit the Expression of Interest/Resolution Plan in their individual capacity within two weeks. If the applicant complies, the Resolution Professional is to register the Corporate Debtor as an MSME upon producing the necessary certificate. This decision was based on the fact that the Corporate Debtor qualified as an MSME under the revised norms, aligning with the legislative intent to promote entrepreneurship and maximize the value of assets of the Corporate Debtor.

 

 

 

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates