9911796707
|
Home
Forgot password New User/ Regiser ⇒ Register to get Live Demo
2021 (7) TMI 215 - AT - Income TaxInterest u/s.244A - whether assessee is entitled for additional interest as per the provisions of section 244A(1A) ? - HELD THAT? - As decided in NIMA SPECIFIC FAMILY TRUST VERSUS ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX CIRCLE 5 (2) 2018 (10) TMI 441 - GUJARAT HIGH COURT assessment year for which the claim for additional interest u/s. 244(1A) of the Act was made is 2004-05. The Hon'ble High Court after analyzing provisions of section 244(1), 244(1A) and section 153 of the Act held that the claim for additional interest cannot be granted for the periods under provisions of section 244A 1A and 153A of the Act when the same were not in the statute book at all i.e., prior to 01.06.2016. Provisions of section 244A (1A) would apply only prospectively w.e.f 01.06.2016 and hence additional interest would be eligible only from that date and not from 01.04.2016. As the Hon'ble High Court has imposed caveat explaining the circumstances under which the additional interest can be granted u/s. 244A 1A of the Act, we are of the view that this matter should go back to the file of the Assessing Officer for examining the facts of the assessee in the present appeals and for application of the ratio of decision in view of the observations of their lordships on applicability of the additional interest to the present appeals.
Issues Involved:
1. Adjustment of refund against tax or interest for computing interest under Section 244A. 2. Eligibility for additional interest under Section 244A(1A). Issue 1: Adjustment of Refund Against Tax or Interest for Computing Interest Under Section 244A The Revenue's appeals raised the issue of whether the refund should be adjusted first against the tax refund or the interest refund while computing the grant of interest under Section 244A of the Income-tax Act, 1961. The Ld. Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) [Ld.CIT(A)] had directed the Assessing Officer to compute interest under Section 244A following the decision of the Hon'ble Delhi High Court in the case of India Trade Promotion Organization v. CIT [361 ITR 646] and the Mumbai Tribunal decision in the case of Union Bank of India v. ACIT. The Delhi High Court held that the words "any amount" in Section 244A are broader than just the tax amount and include the interest element. Therefore, when the Revenue does not pay the full refund amount, it must pay interest on the outstanding balance, which may include both tax and interest components. The Tribunal found no error in the Ld.CIT(A)'s direction to comply with the Delhi High Court's decision and rejected the Revenue's grounds. Issue 2: Eligibility for Additional Interest Under Section 244A(1A) The assessee's appeals concerned whether they were entitled to additional interest under Section 244A(1A) of the Act. The Ld.CIT(A) rejected the claim, stating that Section 244A(1A) was inserted by the Finance Act, 2016, effective from 01.06.2016, and therefore did not apply to the assessment years 2002-03 and 2003-04. The assessee argued that the provisions should have retrospective effect, relying on the Hon'ble Gujarat High Court's decision in Nima Specific Family Trust v. ACIT [100 taxman.com 262], which held that Section 244A(1A) has retrospective effect. The Tribunal reviewed the Gujarat High Court's decision, which analyzed the statutory provisions and concluded that the claim for additional interest could not be granted for periods before the provisions were in the statute book. However, the High Court introduced a caveat for cases where the appellate or revisional order was passed before 01.06.2016, and the Assessing Officer did not pass the consequential order within the time provided by the amendments. In such cases, the liability to pay additional interest would arise after 01.06.2016. The Tribunal concluded that Section 244A(1A) applies prospectively from 01.06.2016, and additional interest is only eligible from that date. The Tribunal restored the issue to the Assessing Officer to examine the facts and apply the Gujarat High Court's decision. Thus, the appeals of the revenue were dismissed, and the assessee's appeals were partly allowed for statistical purposes.
|
