Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding
  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram

Home Case Index All Cases GST GST + AAR GST - 2021 (12) TMI AAR This

  • Login
  • Summary

Forgot password       New User/ Regiser

⇒ Register to get Live Demo



 

2021 (12) TMI 112 - AAR - GST


Issues: Classification of goods for tax purposes

Analysis:
1. Classification under HSN 30049011: The applicant claimed that the goods, 'Aorom Herbal Smokes,' should be classified under HSN 30049011. However, the Authority noted that this HSN pertains to Ayurvedic medicaments, and preparations intended to assist smokers to stop smoking are excluded from this category as per Section Note 1(b) of Chapter 30 of the Customs Tariff Act.

2. Exclusion from Ayurvedic Medicines: The applicant did not establish that the goods qualified as Ayurvedic medicines under the Drugs and Cosmetics Act, 1940. The Authority opined that in the market, these goods are perceived as cigarettes without Tobacco/Nicotine, not as medicinal products, based on common understanding.

3. Classification under HSN 24029010: Considering the absence of Nicotine in the product and its nature as a tobacco substitute, the Authority classified the goods under HSN 24029010 as 'Cigarettes of tobacco substitutes.' This classification aligns with the Customs Tariff Act and the General Rules for Interpretation.

4. Tax Liability: The Authority determined the tax liability for the goods as follows: 28% IGST on inter-state supply with Compensation Cess, and 14% CGST + 14% SGST on intra-state supply with Compensation Cess. This decision was based on the specific classification of 'Cigarettes of tobacco substitutes' under the GST regime.

In conclusion, the Authority ruled that the 'Aorom Herbal Smokes' should be classified as 'Cigarettes of tobacco substitutes' under HSN 24029010 for tax purposes, attracting the specified tax rates and Compensation Cess as per the GST notifications. The decision was grounded in the legal framework, including the Customs Tariff Act and the relevant statutory provisions.

 

 

 

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates