Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding
  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram

Home Case Index All Cases Income Tax Income Tax + HC Income Tax - 2022 (2) TMI HC This

  • Login
  • Cases Cited
  • Referred In
  • Summary

Forgot password       New User/ Regiser

⇒ Register to get Live Demo



 

2022 (2) TMI 534 - HC - Income Tax


Issues:
- Appeal filed by revenue challenging a common order passed by the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal
- Substantial questions of law raised by the revenue for consideration
- Cancellation of registration under Section 12AA(3) of the Income Tax Act
- Allegations of circuitous transactions and cancellation of registration by the Commissioner of Income Tax
- Assessee's response and contentions against cancellation of registration
- Tribunal's examination of facts and legal principles
- Application of legal principles from the case of Commissioner of Income Tax vs. Sarladevi Sarabhai Trust
- Tribunal's decision and dismissal of appeals

Detailed Analysis:
The High Court of Calcutta heard appeals filed by the revenue challenging a common order passed by the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal for the assessment year 2006-07. The revenue raised substantial questions of law, including the genuineness of the assessee's activities, reversal of registration cancellation under Section 12AA(3), and the applicability of Section 12AA(3) considering the Finance Act, 2010. The court considered arguments from both sides, with Mr. Tilak Mitra representing the revenue and Mr. J. P. Khaitan representing the assessee.

The case revolved around the cancellation of registration granted under Section 12A of the Income Tax Act due to allegations of circuitous transactions by the assessee trust. The Commissioner of Income Tax issued a show cause notice proposing cancellation based on findings of circuitous donations. The assessee contested the cancellation, arguing that the assessing officer's findings were incorrect and lacked evidence. Despite denial of exemption for one year, the assessee had been recognized as a charitable trust in subsequent assessments. The CIT(E) cancelled the registration, leading to appeals before the Tribunal.

The Tribunal examined the facts and legal principles, emphasizing the genuineness of the assessee's activities and the lack of evidence disputing them. It referenced the case of Commissioner of Income Tax vs. Sarladevi Sarabhai Trust to support the assessee's position. The Tribunal criticized the CIT(E) for canceling registration with retrospective effect and found no grounds for cancellation. It highlighted that the activities of the assessee were accepted as charitable by the revenue, and there was no evidence to the contrary.

Referring to the Sarladevi Sarabhai Trust case, the Tribunal concluded that the donor trust could be exempt under Section 11(1) of the Act even if the donation was earmarked for the donee trust's corpus. The Tribunal dismissed the revenue's appeals, upholding the assessee's contentions and legal position. Consequently, the appeals were dismissed, and the substantial questions of law were answered against the revenue. The connected applications for stay were also dismissed by the Court.

 

 

 

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates