Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding
  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram

Home Case Index All Cases Insolvency and Bankruptcy Insolvency and Bankruptcy + Tri Insolvency and Bankruptcy - 2022 (4) TMI Tri This

  • Login
  • Summary

Forgot password       New User/ Regiser

⇒ Register to get Live Demo



 

2022 (4) TMI 526 - Tri - Insolvency and Bankruptcy


Issues Involved:
1. Pre-existing dispute regarding the claim amount.
2. Existence of debt due to the Operational Creditor and non-discharge by the Corporate Debtor.

Issue-wise Detailed Analysis:

I. Pre-existing Dispute Regarding the Claim Amount:

The Corporate Debtor argued that there is a pre-existing dispute, primarily centered around the alleged mismanagement by Mr. M.V. Bhushanam, a former director of the Corporate Debtor and a current director of the Operational Creditor. The Corporate Debtor claimed that Mr. Bhushanam placed orders favoring the Operational Creditor without considering the actual requirements, resulting in non-movable items piling up in the factory. This mismanagement allegedly caused financial losses, leading to heavy interest on borrowings for working capital.

The Tribunal noted that the dispute with Mr. Bhushanam, who was removed as an authorized signatory on 10.06.2017, does not constitute a pre-existing dispute related to the claim made by the Operational Creditor. The Board of Directors' minutes and subsequent actions did not indicate any protest or dispute regarding the transactions between the Operational Creditor and the Corporate Debtor. The Tribunal emphasized that the acknowledgment of debt in the "confirmation of accounts" letter dated 11.12.2017, post Mr. Bhushanam's removal, implies that the transactions were not disputed. The Tribunal concluded that the alleged mismanagement by Mr. Bhushanam does not qualify as a pre-existing dispute relevant to the claim amount.

II. Existence of Debt Due to the Operational Creditor and Non-Discharge by the Corporate Debtor:

The Operational Creditor issued a demand notice under Section 8 of IBC, claiming an outstanding amount of ?1,93,44,700/-. The Corporate Debtor's reply denied liability, attributing the debt to Mr. Bhushanam's mismanagement. However, the Tribunal observed that the invoices for supplies made by the Operational Creditor were not denied and were acknowledged in the "confirmation of accounts" letter dated 11.12.2017, indicating a credit amount of ?2,24,27,544/-.

The Tribunal found that the Corporate Debtor acknowledged the debt and continued making payments until 16.04.2016. The Tribunal noted that no legal action was initiated against Mr. Bhushanam for the alleged mismanagement, and the dispute raised in the reply notice was not genuine or related to the claim. The Tribunal emphasized that the supply of material was undisputed, and the statement of account was confirmed without protest, marginalizing the defenses raised by the Corporate Debtor.

Conclusion:

The Tribunal concluded that the Corporate Debtor has an outstanding debt to the Operational Creditor, and there was no genuine pre-existing dispute. Therefore, the Tribunal admitted the Company Petition and ordered the initiation of the Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process (CIRP) against the Corporate Debtor. Dr. Govindarajula Venkata Narasimha Rao was appointed as the Interim Resolution Professional (IRP), with directions to take charge of the Corporate Debtor's management and proceed with the CIRP.

Order:

1. The Company Petition is admitted, and the CIRP shall commence from the date of the order and be completed within 180 days.
2. Dr. Govindarajula Venkata Narasimha Rao is appointed as the IRP.
3. A moratorium is declared in respect of the Corporate Debtor as per Section 14 of the Code.
4. The Directors, Promoters, or any other persons associated with the management of the Corporate Debtor shall extend all assistance and cooperation to the IRP.
5. The Registry shall communicate the order to the Operational Creditor and the Corporate Debtor forthwith.
6. The Operational Creditor and the Registry shall send a copy of the order to the IRP for necessary compliance.

 

 

 

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates