Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding
  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram

Home Case Index All Cases Income Tax Income Tax + AT Income Tax - 2022 (5) TMI AT This

  • Login
  • Summary

Forgot password       New User/ Regiser

⇒ Register to get Live Demo



 

2022 (5) TMI 102 - AT - Income Tax


Issues:
1. Addition of unexplained cash deposit and non-allowance of receipts from sisters.
2. Treatment of total deposit in bank account as concealed income and denial of peak credit benefit.
3. Validity of assessment on factual and legal grounds.

Analysis:
1. The assessee, an individual non-filer of income tax return, faced an addition of Rs. 22,20,200 as unexplained cash deposit in the bank account for the assessment year 2010-11. The Assessing Officer initiated proceedings under section 148, and despite the assessee's explanations, proceeded to frame the assessment under section 144, adding the total deposit amount as unexplained. The CIT(A) partially accepted the source of deposit from the sale proceeds of agricultural land but sustained the addition of Rs. 12,20,000. The Tribunal considered the submissions regarding cash gifts from sisters, with the AR providing documentary proof of the source of deposits from the sisters. The DR argued lack of evidence for the source of deposit and questioned the correlation between money received from sisters and bank deposits. The Tribunal analyzed the CIT(A)'s discussion, noting the establishment of the availability of cash from the father and uncle but lack of proof for the sisters' creditworthiness and accumulated savings, ultimately allowing a partial deletion of the addition.

2. The Tribunal found that the CIT(A) accepted the source of deposit from the father and uncle but confirmed the addition related to cash gifts from sisters due to the failure to prove their creditworthiness. However, the Tribunal acknowledged the documentary evidence provided by the assessee, showing the transfer of money from the NRI sister and the bank account transfer from another sister. The Tribunal concluded that the assessee had discharged the burden of proof for the source of deposits from the sisters, leading to the deletion of the addition to the extent of Rs. 9 Lac. The remaining amount of Rs. 3,20,000 as accumulated savings was deemed unexplained and confirmed in the assessment.

3. In conclusion, the Tribunal partially allowed the appeal, deleting the addition of Rs. 9 Lac related to cash gifts from sisters based on documentary evidence but confirming the addition of Rs. 3,20,000 as accumulated savings. The judgment emphasized the importance of establishing the source of deposits and creditworthiness, highlighting the need for documentary proof to support claims and explanations in income tax assessments.

 

 

 

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates