Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding
  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram

Home Case Index All Cases Income Tax Income Tax + AT Income Tax - 2022 (9) TMI AT This

  • Login
  • Cases Cited
  • Summary

Forgot password       New User/ Regiser

⇒ Register to get Live Demo



 

2022 (9) TMI 494 - AT - Income Tax


Issues:
Challenge to the sanctity of approval u/s 153D for completion of assessment u/s 153A.

Analysis:

Issue 1: Challenge to the sanctity of approval u/s 153D
The appeals were filed against the order of the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) for Assessment Years 2007-08 to 2013-14, originating from the order of the Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax, Central Circle-1, Jalandhar. The main contention raised by the assessee was regarding the sanctity of the approval u/s 153D for passing the assessment order u/s 153A. The assessee argued that the approval granted by the Additional Commissioner of Income Tax was mechanical and without proper application of mind. The approval was granted on 27.07.2016, but received by the Assessing Officer on 28.07.2016, after the assessment order was already passed on 27.07.2016. The assessee contended that this violated the provisions of section 153D, which requires prior approval of the Joint Commissioner before passing an assessment order. The assessee relied on the judgment of a Coordinate Bench in a similar case, which was decided in favor of the assessee.

Issue 1.1: Compliance with Section 153D
The Assessing Officer sent the record to the Additional Commissioner of Income Tax for approval on 27.07.2016, and the approval was granted on the same day. However, the approval was received by the Assessing Officer on 28.07.2016, after the assessment order was passed. The contention was that the approval should have been received before or during the passing of the assessment order, as mandated by section 153D. The failure to comply with the requirement of prior approval rendered the assessment order erroneous and liable to be quashed. The argument was supported by the fact that the approval was granted after the assessment order was already passed, indicating a clear violation of the statutory provision.

Conclusion:
The Tribunal found merit in the assessee's argument regarding the lack of proper approval u/s 153D before passing the assessment order u/s 153A. The failure to obtain prior approval as required by law rendered the assessment order erroneous. Therefore, the appeal of the assessee was allowed, and all the appeals were allowed accordingly. The judgment highlighted the importance of strict compliance with statutory provisions, especially regarding the requirement of prior approval for assessment orders in cases of search or requisition under the Income Tax Act.

 

 

 

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates