Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding
  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram

Home Case Index All Cases GST GST + AAR GST - 2022 (10) TMI AAR This

  • Login
  • Summary

Forgot password       New User/ Regiser

⇒ Register to get Live Demo



 

2022 (10) TMI 302 - AAR - GST


Issues Involved:
1. Classification of the project location as a "Non-Metropolitan City" under GST notifications.
2. Determination of GST rate applicable to the project.

Detailed Analysis:

Issue 1: Classification of the Project Location as a "Non-Metropolitan City"

The applicant, VGK Property Developers Private Limited, sought an advance ruling on whether their project located in Rajakilpakkam, Kanchipuram, could be classified as an "Affordable Residential Apartment" in a "Non-Metropolitan City" under Notification No. 11/2017 - Central Tax (Rate) as amended by Notification 3/2019 CT (Rate). The applicant argued that various authorities consider the area differently for different purposes and that the Sembakkam Municipality, which collects property tax for the project, should be the determining authority.

The statutory provisions were examined, including SL No. 3, item (i) of Notification No. 11/2017 - Central Tax (Rate) and Para 4(xvi) of the same notification, which define "Affordable Residential Apartment" and specify the criteria for classification based on carpet area and value limits. The applicant's project was claimed to fall outside the jurisdiction of Chennai, thus qualifying as a "Non-Metropolitan City."

Issue 2: Determination of GST Rate Applicable to the Project

The applicant contended that if the project is classified as being in a "Non-Metropolitan City," the applicable GST rate would be 1.5% on the value of supply (effective rate of 1% on the total amount charged).

Judgment Analysis:

1. Examination of Documents:
- Various documents submitted by the applicant, including planning permits, building plan approvals, and property tax demand notices issued by the Sembakkam Municipality, were scrutinized.
- The Chennai Metropolitan Development Authority (CMDA) was found to be involved in the approval and collection of development charges, indicating that the project falls under the Chennai Metropolitan Area.

2. Definition of Metropolitan Cities:
- The Census Commission of India and the 74th Amendment to the Indian Constitution define metropolitan areas based on population and administrative boundaries.
- The Chennai Metropolitan Development Authority (CMDA) administers the Chennai Metropolitan Region, which includes Kanchipuram.

3. Statutory Provisions:
- Under the Tamil Nadu Town and Country Planning Act, 1971, the CMDA is authorized to regulate real estate development within the Chennai Metropolitan Area.
- The documents indicated that the Sembakkam Municipality, while the local body for issuing approvals, collected development charges on behalf of the CMDA, reinforcing the project's classification within the Chennai Metropolitan Area.

4. Conclusion:
- The project was determined to be within the Chennai Metropolitan Area.
- Consequently, the project does not qualify as being in a "Non-Metropolitan City" under Notification No. 11/2017 - Central Tax (Rate) as amended by Notification 3/2019 CT (Rate).

Ruling:
The units in the impugned project are within the Chennai Metropolitan area and hence cannot be considered as located in a city or town "other than Metropolitan Cities" in terms of the relevant GST notifications. The ruling confirms that the project does not qualify for the lower GST rate applicable to "Non-Metropolitan Cities."

This comprehensive analysis ensures that all relevant issues, legal terminology, and significant phrases from the original judgment are preserved, providing a thorough understanding of the judgment.

 

 

 

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates