Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding
  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram

Home Case Index All Cases Central Excise Central Excise + AT Central Excise - 2023 (7) TMI AT This

  • Login
  • Cases Cited
  • Summary

Forgot password       New User/ Regiser

⇒ Register to get Live Demo



 

2023 (7) TMI 578 - AT - Central Excise


Issues involved:
The issue involves whether additional consideration received by the appellants in the form of credit notes for sale of Ferric Oxide by another company, which emerged through a chemical reaction of Waste Pickle Liquor supplied by the appellants, is required to be added to the transaction value as per Rule 6 of Excise Valuation Rules, 2000.

Comprehensive Details:

Issue 1: Valuation of additional consideration received

The appellants supplied Waste Pickle Liquor (WPL) to another company, which resulted in the generation of Ferric Oxide. The other company issued credit notes to the appellants for 50% of the proceeds from the sale of Ferric Oxide. The department contended that the credit notes constitute additional consideration under Rule 6 of Valuation Rules, 2000, and issued a show cause notice for differential Central Excise duty. The appellants argued that WPL is a waste product and not an excisable good, citing precedents where similar situations were deemed non-dutiable.

Issue 2: Applicability of Valuation Rules

The Tribunal differentiated the present case from a previous case where the issue was the inclusion of scrap value in transaction value. In the current matter, WPL is considered waste emerging during the manufacturing process and does not qualify as an excisable good. Relying on precedents, the Tribunal concluded that Valuation Rules, 2000 do not apply to WPL, as it is not a marketable or saleable product. Therefore, the demand for additional duty based on the credit notes issued for Ferric Oxide sales was deemed unsustainable.

Final Decision

The Tribunal set aside the impugned order, ruling in favor of the appellants. The Tribunal emphasized that WPL, being a waste product, is not liable to duty. The consideration received for Ferric Oxide cannot be deemed consideration for WPL, as WPL is not a marketable product. The appellants were not involved in the conversion of Ferric Oxide, further supporting the decision to allow the appeal.

*(Pronounced in open Court on 11.07.2023)*

 

 

 

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates