Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding
  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram

Home Case Index All Cases Customs Customs + AT Customs - 2023 (7) TMI AT This

  • Login
  • Cases Cited
  • Referred In
  • Summary

Forgot password       New User/ Regiser

⇒ Register to get Live Demo



 

2023 (7) TMI 598 - AT - Customs


Issues involved:
Classification of the item 'Line Extender' under Chapter Heading 8517 or 8543.

Details of the judgment:

Issue 1: Classification of 'Line Extender'
The appellant imported various items, including a 'Line Extender', which was classified by the Commissioner (Appeals) under Chapter Heading 8543 7069 as a Broadcast Signal Amplifier. The appellant challenged this classification, arguing that the 'Line Extender' should be classified under Chapter Heading 8517 62 as a Digital Subscriber Line (DSL) repeater.

Details:
- The appellant's advocate cited definitions from Webster's New World Telecom Dictionary and information from a website to support the classification of 'Line Extender' as a DSL repeater.
- Reference was made to a decision by the Advance Ruling Authority and a ruling by the United States International Trade Commission to argue that similar devices were classified under Chapter Heading 8517.
- The Revenue representative maintained that the 'Line Extender' should be classified under 8543 7069.

Issue 2: Analysis of Chapter Headings
The dispute centered on whether the 'Line Extender' should be classified under Chapter Heading 8517 or 8543. The appellant argued that the 'Line Extender' is a transmission system enhancing weak signals, similar to a DSL repeater, thus falling under Chapter Heading 8517.

Details:
- The Chapter Headings for 8517 and 8543 were compared to determine the appropriate classification.
- It was noted that an amplifier under 8543 must be an independent functional unit, whereas the 'Line Extender' is an integral part of a Digital Subscriber Line system.
- The Explanatory Notes to Chapter Heading 8517 supported the classification of 'Line Extender' as part of a digital line system under 8517.

Conclusion:
The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant, setting aside the Commissioner (Appeals) classification and allowing the appeal. The 'Line Extender' was deemed rightly classifiable under Chapter Heading 8517 as a part of a Digital Subscriber Line system.

Separate Judgment:
No separate judgment was delivered by the judges in this case.

 

 

 

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates