Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding
  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram

Home Case Index All Cases Income Tax Income Tax + AT Income Tax - 2023 (8) TMI AT This

  • Login
  • Cases Cited
  • Summary

Forgot password       New User/ Regiser

⇒ Register to get Live Demo



 

2023 (8) TMI 146 - AT - Income Tax


Issues involved:
The judgment deals with the taxability of income from royalty in the context of a lease agreement between a non-resident corporate entity and an Indian entity.

Taxability of Income from Royalty:
The dispute in the appeal centered around the taxability of Rs. 1,43,59,792/- as income from royalty. The Assessing Officer contended that the lease charges received from leasing a helicopter should be treated as royalty under the India-UAE Double Taxation Avoidance Agreement (DTAA) and the Income-tax Act, 1961. The Assessing Officer's decision was upheld by the Commissioner (Appeals).

Contentions of the Assessee:
The assessee argued that the lease of the helicopter did not involve the transfer of intellectual property rights, and therefore, the lease rental should not be taxed as royalty. The assessee also contended that as no income was received from the lessee, the royalty income cannot be taxed on an accrual basis.

Department's Position:
The Departmental Representative asserted that income from the use of equipment, including helicopters, is taxable as royalty under the Act and the India-UAE DTAA. The Department argued that even if no income was received, royalty income can be taxed on an accrual basis.

Judgment and Analysis:
The Tribunal considered the factual position where the assessee did not receive any payment towards leasing the helicopter due to disputes and litigation. The Tribunal analyzed the relevant provisions of the India-UAE DTAA regarding the taxability of royalty income. It was observed that as no income was actually received by the assessee, the conditions for taxing royalty income were not met. The Tribunal held that the royalty income cannot be added on a notional basis and directed the Assessing Officer to delete the addition sustained by the Commissioner (Appeals). The Tribunal did not delve into the issue of whether the amount could be treated as equipment royalty under the domestic law and treaty provisions.

Conclusion:
The appeal was allowed, and the addition of Rs. 1,43,59,792/- as royalty income was deleted. The judgment emphasized the importance of actual receipt of royalty income for taxability purposes under the India-UAE DTAA.

 

 

 

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates