9911796707
|
Home
Forgot password New User/ Regiser ⇒ Register to get Live Demo
2024 (1) TMI 418 - AT - Income TaxHigher rate of tax u/s 115BBE - Unexplained investment in stock - difference in valuation of stock found during the course of survey conducted u/s. 133A - Addition u/s. 69B - higher rate of tax applied invoking the provisions of section 115BBE - HELD THAT - As decided in Overseas Leather 2023 (4) TMI 1207 - ITAT CHENNAI wherein when the assessee has explained that the source was from the business and except stock difference, no other investment with any other asset was found and particularly, this unexplained investment is surrendered as business income , in the absence of any other finding, the same has to be assessed as business income and not under the head unexplained investment u/s. 69B As noted that the assessee has declared additional income towards excess stock found during the course of survey and assessee has explained the source for excess stock found during the course of survey i.e., that it was out of income earned from current year business or earlier years business and surrendered the amount, the AO has not done anything to dispute the claim of assessee that the source was not from the business income. Hence, the AO cannot apply the provisions of section 115BBE - assessee also admitted the difference as income, which is not disputed but has to be taxed as normal business income and not as unexplained investment u/s. 69B of the Act. Accordingly, we allow the grounds of appeal of assessee.
Issues Involved:
The judgment involves the issue of addition of unexplained investment in stock, difference in stock valuation found during a survey, and application of higher tax rate under section 115BBE of the Income Tax Act. Issue 1: Addition of Unexplained Investment in Stock The assessee contested the addition of unexplained investment in stock made by the Assessing Officer (AO) under section 69B of the Act. The AO relied on the decision of the High Court of Madras and treated the excess stock as unexplained investment. The Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) upheld the AO's action, stating that the excess stock was unaccounted and the assessee failed to provide a satisfactory explanation for the source of the investment. The CIT(A) referred to the jurisdictional High Court's decision, emphasizing that conflicting views between High Courts must be resolved by following the jurisdictional High Court's decision. The assessee, however, argued that the excess stock was explained as business income and should not be treated as unexplained investment. The Tribunal noted that the assessee declared the additional income from excess stock as business income and explained the source of the stock as income earned from the business. As the AO did not dispute the source of income, the Tribunal held that the excess stock should be taxed as normal business income and not as unexplained investment under section 69B of the Act. Issue 2: Valuation of Stock and Explanation by Assessee During the survey, the Department found excess stock valued at Rs. 1,04,00,600. The assessee explained that this excess stock was offered as business income and not as unexplained investment. The assessee provided detailed calculations and explanations regarding the valuation of stock, arguing that the excess stock was actually a deficit stock based on their records. The Tribunal considered the explanations provided by the assessee, including the nature of the business, stock valuation methods, and previous assessments. The Tribunal noted that the assessee's explanation regarding the source of income for the excess stock was plausible and consistent with the business activities. The Tribunal found that the excess stock should be treated as normal business income and not as unexplained investment, as contended by the revenue authorities. Separate Judgment by the Tribunal: The Tribunal allowed the appeal filed by the assessee, reversing the orders of the CIT(A) and the AO. The Tribunal concluded that the excess stock should be taxed as normal business income and not as unexplained investment under section 69B of the Act. The appeal of the assessee was allowed, and the order was pronounced in the open court on 29th December 2023 at Chennai.
|
