9911796707
|
Home
Issues:
Levy of penalty under s. 271(1)(c) for asst. yr. 1998-99. Analysis: The appeals involved a common issue of the levy of penalty under section 271(1)(c) for the assessment year 1998-99. The assessee was treated as an agent for expatriate employees, and returns were filed before the notice under section 148 was issued. The assessments were completed with the assessee claiming exemption under section 10(5B), resulting in a lesser assessed income than the declared income. Despite this, penalties under section 271(1)(c) were imposed for filing returns after detection. The contention was that no concealment exists when the entire income is declared, and the assessment is on a lesser income. The Tribunal agreed that there was no concealment in such cases. The applicability of Explanation 3 to section 271(1)(c) was also considered, where it was noted that notices issued after the return filing were invalid. The Tribunal referred to legal precedents to support the position that concealment occurs at the time of filing the original return. The Departmental Representative's reliance on certain decisions was deemed misplaced as they were factually distinguishable. Ultimately, the penalties imposed were deleted, and the appeals by the assesses were allowed. In conclusion, the Tribunal found that no concealment existed as the entire income was declared, and the assessments were on a lesser income. The notices issued after the return filing were deemed invalid, and the penalties under section 271(1)(c) were deleted. The decision was based on legal principles regarding the timing of concealment and the validity of notices in assessment proceedings.
|
