2024 (12) TMI 306 - SCH - Customs

Fraudulent drawback claim - Misdeclaration of goods and serial numbers - it was held by High Court that 'The Appellant has been unable to show that any relevant piece of evidence has been overlooked or that the appreciation of the evidence by the Commissioner or the CESTAT is perverse.' - HELD THAT - There are no reason to interfere with the impugned order passed by the High Court. The Special Leave Petition is, accordingly, dismissed.

Summary

The Supreme Court dismissed the Special Leave Petition after finding no reason to interfere with the impugned order passed by the High Court. The pending application was also disposed of.

Citation: TMI
Judges: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE J. B. PARDIWALA and HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R. MAHADEVAN
Petitioner's Counsel: Ms. Anita Shenoy, Sr. Adv. Ms. Shikha Sapra, Adv. Mr. Piyush Kumar, Adv. Ms. Reena Rawat, Adv. Mr. Rajeev Singh, AOR
Respondent's Counsel: Mr. N Venkataraman, A.S.G. Mr. Mukesh Kumar Maroria, AOR Mr. Gurmeet Singh Makker, AOR Ms. Praveena Gautam, Adv. Ms. Sansriti Pathak, Adv. Mr. Udai Khanna, Adv. Mr. Chitvan Singhal, Adv