Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding
  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram

Home Case Index All Cases GST GST + HC GST - 2025 (1) TMI HC This

  • Login
  • Cases Cited
  • Summary

Forgot password       New User/ Regiser

⇒ Register to get Live Demo



 

2025 (1) TMI 120 - HC - GST


In the case before the Patna High Court, the issue concerned an amendment to Section 112 of the Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017, which reduced the pre-deposit requirement for filing an appeal before the Goods and Services Tax Tribunal from "twenty per cent" to "ten per cent," effective from 01.11.2024. However, since the GST Tribunals have not yet been constituted, the court addressed the interim situation.

The court directed that the assessee, upon payment of "ten per cent" of the disputed tax amount, would be entitled to a stay of recovery until the Tribunal is constituted and an appeal is filed. This decision aligns with the judgment in SAJ Food Products Pvt. Ltd. vs. The State of Bihar & Others.

The court laid out specific terms for the writ petition:

1. The petitioner must deposit 10% of the disputed tax amount to receive the statutory benefit of stay under Sub-Section (9) of Section 112 of the B.G.S.T. Act. The non-constitution of the Tribunal should not deprive the petitioner of this benefit, and recovery actions will be stayed.

2. The stay is not indefinite; the petitioner must file an appeal under Section 112 of the B.G.S.T. Act once the Tribunal is operational, adhering to statutory requirements.

3. If the petitioner does not file an appeal within the specified period after the Tribunal's constitution, the authorities may proceed according to law.

4. Upon compliance with the order and payment of 10% of the remaining disputed tax, any bank account attachment related to the demand will be released.

The writ petition was disposed of with these directions.

 

 

 

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates