9911796707
|
Home
Forgot password New User/ Regiser ⇒ Register to get Live Demo
2025 (4) TMI 1484 - AT - Income TaxDeduction u/s 80G - donations made as part of its Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) obligations - HELD THAT - We are of the view that the CIT(A) s conclusion - though acknowledging the inapplicability of clauses (iiihk)/(iiihl) - is contrary to the legislative structure and fails to appreciate the scope and autonomy of section 80G within Chapter VI-A. In light of the legislative intent behind Explanation 2 to section 37(1) of the Act the structure and operation of Chapter VI-A judicial consensus from Co-ordinate Benches and full compliance by the assessee with the conditions of section 80G we hold that the assessee is entitled to deduction u/s 80G. The disallowance made by the AO and sustained by the CIT(A) is hereby directed to be deleted. Appeal of the assessee is allowed.
1. ISSUES PRESENTED and CONSIDERED
The core legal question considered by the Tribunal is whether the assessee is entitled to claim a deduction under section 80G of the Income-tax Act, 1961, for donations made as part of its mandatory Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) obligations under section 135 of the Companies Act, 2013. Specifically, the Tribunal examined:
2. ISSUE-WISE DETAILED ANALYSIS Issue: Deductibility under section 80G of donations made as mandatory CSR expenditure disallowed under Explanation 2 to section 37(1) Relevant legal framework and precedents: Section 80G of the Income-tax Act provides for deduction from gross total income in respect of donations to specified funds and charitable institutions. Section 37(1) allows deduction of business expenses, but Explanation 2 to section 37(1), inserted by the Finance (No. 2) Act, 2014, explicitly disallows deduction of CSR expenditure under business income. The legislative amendments also introduced specific exclusions under section 80G(2) for donations to Swachh Bharat Kosh and Clean Ganga Fund, excluding CSR-related donations to these funds from deduction. Judicial precedents relied upon by the assessee include decisions from co-ordinate benches, such as AIA Engineering Ltd., Power Mech Projects Ltd., and Societe Generale Securities India (P.) Ltd., which held that deduction under section 80G remains available for CSR donations unless specifically excluded under section 80G(2). Court's interpretation and reasoning: The Tribunal observed that Explanation 2 to section 37(1) was introduced to prevent companies from treating mandatory CSR expenditure as a business expense to reduce taxable profits. However, there is no corresponding bar on claiming deduction under Chapter VI-A, including section 80G. The Tribunal emphasized the principle of expressio unius est exclusio alterius, noting that Parliament explicitly excluded CSR donations only for two funds under section 80G(2)(iiihk) and (iiihl). The absence of a general prohibition on CSR donations under section 80G indicates a deliberate legislative choice allowing such deductions if other conditions are met. Key evidence and findings:
Application of law to facts: The Tribunal held that since the CSR expenditure was disallowed under section 37(1), the assessee was not claiming a business deduction but a deduction under section 80G from gross total income. Given the donees' registration under section 80G(5) and absence of any express bar under section 80G for CSR donations (except the two specified funds), the assessee's claim was valid. The Tribunal rejected the CIT(A)'s reasoning that CSR donations are inherently ineligible for section 80G deduction, stating that such interpretation conflicts with legislative intent and statutory scheme. Treatment of competing arguments: The Assessing Officer and CIT(A) argued that CSR expenditure is mandatory and not voluntary, thus ineligible for deduction under section 80G, relying on Explanation 2 to section 37(1) and the nature of CSR obligations. The Tribunal disagreed, clarifying that Explanation 2 applies only to business income deductions and does not extend to Chapter VI-A deductions. The Tribunal further rejected the CIT(A)'s reliance on the exclusionary clauses as the donees did not fall within those categories. Conclusions: The Tribunal concluded that the assessee is entitled to deduction of Rs. 11,02,500 under section 80G. The disallowance by the AO and confirmation by the CIT(A) were set aside. 3. SIGNIFICANT HOLDINGS "The Finance (No. 2) Act, 2014 inserted Explanation 2 to section 37(1) to explicitly disallow CSR expenses as a deduction under the head 'profits and gains of business or profession'. However, there is no corresponding bar introduced in Chapter VI-A, which governs deductions from gross total income, including under section 80G. The Explanatory Memorandum to the Finance Bill, 2014, clarifies that the objective was to prevent companies from reducing taxable business profits by treating CSR as business expenditure, since such spending constitutes an application of income. Notably, the memorandum does not propose any bar on deduction under section 80G, nor does the Finance Act insert such a restriction despite having amended section 80G to insert specific exclusions for donations to Swachh Bharat Kosh [clause (iiihk)] and Clean Ganga Fund [clause (iiihl)]. This drafting choice reflects the principle of expressio unius est exclusio alterius - the express exclusion of certain CSR donations in clauses (iiihk) and (iiihl) implies that other CSR donations, if otherwise qualifying under section 80G, remain allowable. If Parliament had intended to prohibit all CSR-related donations from deduction under section 80G, it could have explicitly done so, just as it did for those two specific funds. The absence of such a general prohibition must be presumed to be deliberate. Therefore, any administrative or interpretive extension of Explanation 2 to section 37(1) into the domain of section 80G would amount to judicial legislation, contrary to settled canons of construction." Core principles established include the autonomy of section 80G deductions from business income deductions under section 37(1), the necessity of explicit legislative exclusion for denying section 80G benefits on CSR donations, and the application of expressio unius est exclusio alterius in statutory interpretation. Final determination: The assessee's claim of deduction under section 80G for donations made as part of mandatory CSR expenditure is upheld, and the disallowance by the Assessing Officer and CIT(A) is quashed.
|
