Home
Forgot password New User/ Regiser ⇒ Register to get Live Demo
1998 (1) TMI 237 - CEGAT, NEW DELHIExtract: .......mported by the appellant was 30 metric tonnes. The price declared by the appellant was 5 less than the price shown in the invoices relied on by the Department. This difference could reasonably be attributed to quantity discount. Therefore, there was no justification to enhance the price. 3. emsp We set aside the impugned order and allow the appeal.
|