Clarification on refund related issues - GST - States - Circular No. 147/03-HGST/2021/GST-II

HARYANA GOVERNMENT EXCISE AND TAXATION DEPARTMENT Circular No. 147/03-HGST/2021/GST-II, dated March 30, 2021. Subject : Clarification on refund related issues Regarding Various representations have been received seeking clarification on some of the issues relating to GST refunds. The issues have been examined and to ensure uniformity in the implementation of the provisions of law across the field formations, the Commissioner of State Tax, in exercise of its powers conferred by section 168 of the Haryana Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 (hereinafter referred to as HGST Act ), hereby clarifies the issues detailed hereunder : 2. Clarification in respect of refund claim by recipient of deemed export supply 2.1 Representations have been received in respect of difficulties being faced by the recipients of the deemed export supplies in claiming refund of tax paid in respect of such supplies since the system is not allowing them to file refund claim under the aforesaid category unless the claimed amount is debited in the electronic credit ledger. 2.2 Para 41 of circular issued vide Memo No. 3561/GST-2, Panchkula dated the December 16, 2019 (Circular No. 125/44/2019-GST, dated November 18, 2019 of Central) has placed a condition that the recipient of deemed export supplies for obtaining the refund of tax paid on such supplies shall submit an undertaking that he has not availed ITC on invoices for which refund has been claimed. Thus, in terms of the above circular, the recipient of deemed export supplies cannot avail ITC on such supplies but when they proceed to file refund on the portal, the system requires them to debit the amount so claimed from their electronic credit ledger. 2.3 The third proviso to rule 89(1) of the HGST Rules, 2017 allows for refund of tax paid in case of a deemed export supply to the recipient or the supplier of deemed export supplies. The said proviso is reproduced as under : Provided also that in respect of supplies regarded as deemed exports, the application may be filed by, (a) the recipient of deemed export supplies ; or (b) the supplier of deemed export supplies in cases where the recipient does not avail of input tax credit on such supplies and furnishes an undertaking to the effect that the supplier may claim the refund. From the above, it can be seen that there is no restriction on recipient of deemed export supplies in availing ITC of the tax paid on such supplies when the recipient files for refund claim. The said restriction has been placed by Circular issued vide Memo no. 3561/GST-2, Panchkula dated December 16, 2019 (Circular No. 125/44/2019-GST, dated November 18, 2019 of central). 2.4 In this regard, it is submitted that in order to ensure that there is no dual benefit to the claimant, the portal allows refund of only input tax credit (ITC) to the recipients which is required to be debited by the claimant while filing application for refund claim. Therefore, whenever the recipient of deemed export supplies files an application for refund, the portal requires debit of the equivalent amount from the electronic credit ledger of the claimant. 2.5 As stated above, there is no restriction under third proviso to rule 89(1) of the HGST Rules, 2017 on recipient of deemed export supply, claiming refund of tax paid on such deemed export supply, on availment of ITC on the tax paid on such supply. Therefore, the para 41 of Circular issued vide Memo No. 3561/GST-2, Panchkula dated December 16, 2019 (Circular No. 125/44/2019-GST, dated November 18, 2019 of Central) is modified to remove the restriction of non-availment of ITC by the recipient of deemed export supplies on the invoices, for which refund has been claimed by such recipient. The amended para 41 of Circular issued vide Memo No. 3561/GST-2, Panchkula dated December 16, 2019 (Circular No. 125/44/2019-GST, dated November 18, 2019 of central) would read as under : 41. Certain supplies of goods have been notified as deemed exports vide Notification No. 115/ST-2, dated October 18, 2017 under section 147 of the HGST Act. Further, the third proviso to rule 89(1) of the HGST Rules allows either the recipient or the supplier to apply for refund of tax paid on such deemed export supplies. In case such refund is sought by the supplier of deemed export supplies, the documentary evidences as specified in Notification No. 116/ST-2, dated October 18, 2017 are also required to be furnished which includes an undertaking that the recipient of deemed export supplies shall not claim the refund in respect of such supplies and shall not avail any input tax credit on such supplies. Similarly, in case the refund is filed by the recipient of deemed export supplies, an undertaking shall have to be furnished by him stating that refund has been claimed only for those invoices which have been detailed in statement 5B for the tax period for which refund is being claimed and the amount does not exceed the amount of input tax credit availed in the valid return filed for the said tax period. The recipient shall also be required to declare that the supplier has not claimed refund with respect to the said supplies. The procedure regarding procurement of supplies of goods from DTA by export oriented unit (EOU)/electronic hardware technology park (EHTP) unit/software technology park (STP) unit/bio-technology parks (BTP) Unit under deemed export as laid down in Circular No. 14/14/2017-GST, dated November 6, 2017 issued by Central needs to be complied with. 3. Extension of relaxation for filing refund claim in cases where zero-rated supplies has been wrongly declared in table 3.1(a). 3.1 Para 26 of circular issued vide Memo No. 3561/GST-2, Panchkula, dated the December 16, 2019 (Circular No. 125/44/2019-GST, dated November 18, 2019 of Central) gave a clarification in relation to cases where taxpayers had inadvertently entered the details of export of services or zero-rated supplies to a special economic zone unit/developer in table 3.1(a) instead of table 3.1(b) of Form GSTR-3B of the relevant period and were unable to claim refund of the integrated tax paid on the same through Form GST RFD-01A. This was because of a validation check placed on the common portal which prevented the value of refund of integrated tax/cess in Form GST RFD-01A from being more than the amount of integrated tax/cess declared in table 3.1(b) of Form GSTR-3B. The said circular clarified that for the tax periods from July 1, 2017 to June 30, 2019, such registered persons shall be allowed to file the refund application in Form GST RFD-01A on the common portal subject to the condition that the amount of refund of integrated tax/cess claimed shall not be more than the aggregate amount of integrated tax/cess mentioned in the tables 3.1(a), 3.1(b) and 3.1(c) of Form GSTR-3B filed for the corresponding tax period. 3.2 Since the clarification issued vide the above circular was valid only from July 1, 2017 to June 30, 2019, taxpayers who committed these errors in subsequent periods were not able to file the refund applications in Form GST RFD-01A/Form GST RFD-01. 3.3 The issue has been examined and it has been decided to extend the relaxation provided for filing refund claims where the taxpayer inadvertently entered the details of export of services or zero-rated supplies to a special economic zone unit/developer in table 3.1(a) instead of table 3.1(b) of Form GSTR-3B till March 31, 2021. Accordingly, para 26 of circular issued vide Memo No. 3561/GST-2, Panchkula dated the December 16, 2019 (Circular No. 125/44/2019-GST, dated November 18, 2019 of Central) stands modified as under : 26. In this regard, it is clarified that for the tax periods commencing from July 1, 2017 to March 31, 2021, such registered persons shall be allowed to file the refund application in Form GST RFD-01 on the common portal subject to the condition that the amount of refund of integrated tax/cess claimed shall not be more than the aggregate amount of integrated tax/cess mentioned in the table under columns 3.1(a), 3.1(b) and 3.1(c) of Form GSTR-3B filed for the corresponding tax period. 4. The manner of calculation of adjusted total turnover under sub-rule (4) of rule 89 of the HGST Rules, 2017. 4.1 Doubts have been raised as to whether the restriction on turnover of zero-rated supply of goods to 1.5 times the value of like goods domestically supplied by the same or, similarly placed, supplier, as declared by the supplier, imposed by amendment in definition of the Turnover of zero-rated supply of goods vide Notification No. 19/GST-2, dated March 31, 2020, would also apply for computation of adjusted total turnover in the formula given under rule 89(4) of the HGST Rules, 2017 for calculation of admissible refund amount. 4.2 Sub-rule (4) of rule 89 prescribes the formula for computing the refund of unutilised ITC payable on account of zero-rated supplies made without payment of tax. The formula prescribed under rule 89 (4) is reproduced below, as under : Refund Amount = (Turnover of zero-rated supply of goods + Turnover of zero-rated supply of services) x Net ITC Adjusted Total Turnover 4.3 Adjusted total turnover has been defined in clause (E) of sub-rule (4) of rule 89 as under : Adjusted total turnover means the sum total of the value of (a) the turnover in a State or a Union territory, as defined under clause (112) of section 2, excluding the turnover of services ; and (b) the turnover of zero-rated supply of services determined in terms of clause (D) above and non-zero-rated supply of services, excluding (i) the value of exempt supplies other than zero-rated supplies ; and (ii) the turnover of supplies in respect of which refund is claimed under sub-rule (4A) or sub-rule (4B) or both, if any, during the relevant period. 4.4 Turnover in State as referred to in the definition of adjusted total turnover in rule 89(4) has been defined under sub-section (112) of section 2 of the HGST Act 2017, as : Turnover in State means the aggregate value of all taxable supplies (excluding the value of inward supplies on which tax is payable by a person on reverse charge basis) and exempt supplies made within a State or Union territory by a taxable person, exports of goods or services or both and inter State supplies of goods or services or both made from the State or Union territory by the said taxable person but excludes Central tax, State tax, Union territory tax, integrated tax and cess 4.5 From the examination of the above provisions, it is noticed that adjusted total turnover includes turnover in a State or Union Territory , as defined in section 2(112) of HGST Act. As per section 2(112), turnover in a State or Union Territory includes turnover/ value of export/ zero-rated supplies of goods. The definition of turnover of zero-rated supply of goods has been amended vide Notification No. 19/GST-2, dated March 31, 2020 , as detailed above. In view of the above, it can be stated that the same value of zero-rated/export supply of goods, as calculated as per amended definition of turnover of zero-rated supply of goods , need to be taken into consideration while calculating turnover in a state or a union territory , and accordingly, in adjusted total turnover for the purpose of sub-rule (4) of rule 89. Thus, the restriction of 150 per cent. of the value of like goods domestically supplied, as applied in turnover of zero-rated supply of goods , would also apply to the value of adjusted total turnover in rule 89(4) of the HGST Rules, 2017. 4.6 Accordingly, it is clarified that for the purpose of rule 89(4), the value of export/zero-rated supply of goods to be included while calculating adjusted total turnover will be same as being determined as per the amended definition of turnover of zero-rated supply of goods in the said sub-rule. The same can explained by the following illustration where actual value per unit of goods exported is more than 1.5 times the value of same/similar goods in domestic market, as declared by the supplier : Illustration : Suppose a supplier is manufacturing only one type of goods and is supplying the same goods in both domestic market and overseas. During the relevant period of refund, the details of his inward supply and outward supply details are shown in the table below : Net admissible ITC = Rs. 270 All value in Rs. Outward Supply Value per unit No of units supplied Turnover Turnover as per amended definition Local (Quantity 5) 200 5 1000 1000 Export (Quantity 5) 350 5 1750 1500 (1.5*5*200) Total 2750 2500 The formula for calculation of refund as per rule 89(4) is : Refund Amount = (Turnover of zero-rated supply of goods + Turnover of zero-rated supply of services) x Net ITC Adjusted Total Turnover Turnover of Zero-rated supply of goods (as per amended definition) = Rs. 1500 Adjusted Total Turnover = Rs. 1000 + Rs. 1500 = Rs. 2500 (and not Rs. 1000 + Rs. 1750) Net ITC = Rs. 270 Refund Amount = Rs. 1500*270/2500 = Rs. 162 Thus, the admissible refund amount in the instant case is Rs. 162. 5. Difficulty faced, if any, in implementation of the above circular may please be brought to the notice of the Department. Excise and Taxation Commissioner-cum-Commissioner of State Tax