Strategic Disinvestment and Tax Benefits in Clause 117 of the Income Tax Bill, 2025 VS. Section 72AA of the Income Tax Act, 1961 Clause 117 Treatment of accumulated losses and unabsorbed depreciation in scheme of amalgamation in certain cases. - Income Tax Bill, 2025

Clause 117 Treatment of accumulated losses and unabsorbed depreciation in scheme of amalgamation in certain cases. Income Tax Bill, 2025 Introduction Clause 117 of the Income Tax Bill, 2025 , and Section 72AA of the Income Tax Act, 1961 , both address the treatment of accumulated losses and unabsorbed depreciation in the context of amalgamations. These provisions are crucial in the realm of corporate taxation as they dictate how financial losses and depreciation allowances can be transferred and utilized post-amalgamation. Understanding these provisions is essential for companies undergoing mergers and acquisitions, particularly in the banking and government sectors. The legislative intent behind both Clause 117 and Section 72AA is to facilitate corporate restructuring by allowing the successor entity to benefit from the financial losses and depreciation of the predecessor entities. This commentary will provide a detailed analysis of Clause 117, followed by a comparative analysis with Section 72AA, highlighting similarities, differences, and implications for stakeholders. Objective and Purpose The primary objective of Clause 117 is to streamline the process of amalgamation by ensuring that the financial attributes, specifically accumulated losses and unabsorbed depreciation of the amalgamating entities, are seamlessly transferred to the amalgamated entity. This provision is particularly relevant for banking institutions and government companies, where amalgamations are often driven by strategic disinvestment or regulatory policies. Similarly, Section 72AA was introduced to provide a statutory framework for the carry forward and set off of accumulated losses and unabsorbed depreciation in certain amalgamation scenarios. The provision is designed to prevent the loss of valuable tax attributes that could otherwise be utilized by the successor entity, thereby encouraging restructuring and consolidation in the banking and insurance sectors. Detailed Analysis of Clause 117 Key Provisions 1. Scope of Amalgamation: Clause 117 applies to amalgamations involving: - Banking companies with other banking institutions under a scheme sanctioned by the Central Government. - Banking companies following a strategic disinvestment, provided the amalgamation occurs within five years of the disinvestment. - Corresponding new banks with other corresponding new banks under schemes sanctioned by the Central Government. - Government companies with other government companies under schemes sanctioned by the Central Government. 2. Treatment of Accumulated Loss and Unabsorbed Depreciation:- The provision deems the accumulated loss and unabsorbed depreciation of the amalgamating entities to be the loss and depreciation of the amalgamated entity. This treatment allows the successor entity to utilize these tax attributes in the tax year in which the amalgamation is effected. 3. Carry Forward Limitation:- Clause 117 specifies that any loss forming part of the accumulated loss of the predecessor entity can be carried forward by the successor entity for up to eight tax years following the tax year in which the loss was first computed for the original predecessor entity. Definitions and Interpretations Clause 117 provides specific definitions for terms such as accumulated loss, banking company, banking institution, corresponding new bank, general insurance business, government company, original predecessor entity, strategic disinvestment, and unabsorbed depreciation. These definitions align with existing statutory definitions in related legislation, ensuring consistency in interpretation and application. Practical Implications - For Banking and Government Entities: The provision facilitates smoother transitions during amalgamations by allowing the successor entity to benefit from the accumulated losses and unabsorbed depreciation of the predecessor entities. This can enhance the financial viability of the amalgamated entity and encourage strategic mergers and acquisitions. - Compliance and Reporting: Entities involved in amalgamations must ensure accurate computation and reporting of accumulated losses and unabsorbed depreciation to maximize the benefits of Clause 117. Compliance with procedural requirements set forth by the Central Government is essential. Potential Issues and Ambiguities - Interpretation of Strategic Disinvestment : The term strategic disinvestment may require further clarification to ensure consistent application across different amalgamation scenarios. - Limitation on Carry Forward: The eight-year limitation on carrying forward losses may pose challenges for entities with significant accumulated losses, potentially limiting the tax benefits of amalgamation. Comparative Analysis with Section 72AA Similarities - Both Clause 117 and Section 72AA aim to facilitate the transfer of accumulated losses and unabsorbed depreciation in amalgamation scenarios. - The provisions apply to similar entities, including banking companies, corresponding new banks, and government companies, under schemes sanctioned by the Central Government. - Both provisions allow the successor entity to utilize the tax attributes of the predecessor entities in the year of amalgamation. Differences 1. Terminology and Definitions: While the core definitions are aligned, Clause 117 introduces the concept of strategic disinvestment, which is not explicitly addressed in Section 72AA. This addition reflects the evolving regulatory landscape and the need to accommodate strategic policy decisions. 2. Carry Forward Period: Clause 117 specifies an eight-year limitation on carrying forward losses, whereas Section 72AA does not explicitly mention a time limit. This difference could impact the long-term tax planning strategies of amalgamated entities. 3. Legislative Context: Clause 117 is part of the proposed Income Tax Bill, 2025, reflecting contemporary legislative priorities and economic conditions. In contrast, Section 72AA is rooted in the existing Income Tax Act, 1961, with amendments reflecting historical policy considerations. Implications for Stakeholders - Corporate Strategy: Entities considering amalgamation must evaluate the implications of the carry forward limitations and strategic disinvestment provisions in Clause 117. Strategic planning is essential to maximize the tax benefits of amalgamation. - Regulatory Compliance: Compliance with the procedural requirements of both provisions is crucial to ensure the seamless transfer of tax attributes. Entities must stay informed of any legislative changes or clarifications that may impact their tax liabilities. Conclusion Clause 117 of the Income Tax Bill, 2025 , and Section 72AA of the Income Tax Act, 1961 , provide essential frameworks for the treatment of accumulated losses and unabsorbed depreciation in amalgamation scenarios. While both provisions share common objectives and apply to similar entities, the introduction of strategic disinvestment and the carry forward limitation in Clause 117 reflect evolving legislative priorities. For stakeholders, understanding these provisions is crucial to navigating the complexities of corporate restructuring and maximizing the tax benefits of amalgamation. As the legislative landscape continues to evolve, entities must remain vigilant in monitoring changes and adapting their strategies to align with regulatory requirements. Full Text : Clause 117 Treatment of accumulated losses and unabsorbed depreciation in scheme of amalgamation in certain cases.