Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding
  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram
Discussions Forum
Home Forum Central Excise This

A Public Forum.
Acknowledging the Value of Experts.

Contribute Your Wisdom, Shape the Future.
Let Your Experience Guide Others

Submit new Issue / Query     My IssuesMy Replies
A free service.
You may submit an issue for brainstorming also.

Below 10000 of Capital Goods treated as input, Central Excise

Issue Id: - 110096
Dated: 27-3-2016
By:- Swapneswar muduli

Below 10000 of Capital Goods treated as input


  • Contents

Dear Sir,

According to 2016-budget cenvat credit Rule-2004 has been amended and according to that below amount of 10000 value of capital Goods we can take credit of 100% i.e as a input.

My query is below 10000 value capital Goods Cenvat Credit we can take credit in our RG-23-A that is input credit Register ot RG-23-C that is Capital Goods Credit Register ?

Regards

Swapneswar Muduli

Posts / Replies

Showing Replies 1 to 11 of 11 Records

Page: 1


1 Dated: 27-3-2016
By:- KASTURI SETHI

You may take credit in RG 23 C. Definition of capital goods has not been changed. The benefit is that you have not to take credit in piece meal. You r not to wait for another year for taking whole credit


2 Dated: 27-3-2016
By:- Rajagopalan Ranganathan

Sir,

There no statutory records like R.G.23 A or R.G. 23 C. Your own private accounts will be accepted by the Department. You can take the credit in the same account but at different folio.


3 Dated: 27-3-2016
By:- KASTURI SETHI

It is a matter of common knowledge that RG 23 C & A are not statutory records but the assesses are maintaining the same for their convenience. Otherwise the essence of both replies is the same.


4 Dated: 27-3-2016
By:- Ganeshan Kalyani

Sir, though the maintenance of RG-23 A & C is dispensed with, many Company is still maintaining the records in their accounting systems like SAP, QAD application etc. This gives them a lot of advantages during Excise Audit. Thanks.


5 Dated: 28-3-2016
By:- KASTURI SETHI

Sh.Ganeshan Kalyani Ji,

Yes, Sir. In Chandigarh Zone, 90% manufacturers are maintaining these records with these columns either on computers or manually. These registers are still being sold as there is demand. Most of the assessees maintain Form-IV register which earlier prescribed for raw material. If any person maintains R.G.23 A Part.I, there is no need to maintain Form-IV. But Form-IV is being maintained. Assessees like the columns of these registers very much for proper accountal.


6 Dated: 29-3-2016
By:- surya narayana

Dear Swapneswar,

As already stated there is no such mandatory requirement to maintain RG23-A and C seperately except to maintain a consolidated Cenvat Credit Account which is also not a statutory one. According to me majority of the assessees are only maintaining a consolidated Cenvat Account except, few assessees who are still following the old procedure in some places.

I suggest, in your case if, you are still following the old practice of maintaining RG 23-A and C, you can continue the same and there is no issue .

As far as taking credit is concerned, I suggest you to take the same in RG23-A since, the Rule itself is clear that credit on capital goods upto the Value of ₹ 10000/- per pice, credit can be taken considering that they are inputs. However, if , you have any concern , you may also take in RG23C.

Best Regards

Surya


7 Dated: 29-3-2016
By:- CS SANJAY MALHOTRA

Dear Mr. Swapneshwar,

Can you please revisit your Query ......... You have mentioned "below ₹ 10,000/- value Capital Goods". Budget 2016-17 mentions of ₹ 10,000/- per piece as value of capital goods (for Input Tax Credit Treatment).

Hope you would find difference in between two for sake of better clarity......


8 Dated: 31-3-2016
By:- KASTURI SETHI

Sh. CS SANJAY MALHOTRA Ji,

Sir, This is not an isolated case.


9 Dated: 31-3-2016
By:- CS SANJAY MALHOTRA

Respected Sh. Kasturi ji,

Agreed. But incorrect use of phrases would have adverse impact too. Mentioned below is random example, which all experts are aware of :

For e.g. Bearings purchased 2 Nos costing ₹ 9,000/- each in terms of total Capital Godos cost works out to ₹ 18,000/-. but it should not be taken by querist as though the value of capital goods has increased ₹ 10,000/-, hence CENVAT credit will not be eligible to 100%, which is not the case. Value of CG in terms of per pc has to be seen, which is ₹ 9000/- (less than ₹ 10,000/- per pc) hence CENVAT 100% is eligible.

My submission is that we should make querist also understand to read the law better before placing the query....


10 Dated: 6-5-2016
By:- Yatin Bhopi

Dear all,

I want further clarifiction on value of capital goods per piece.

I have received one bill for pipes where unit of measherment is per Meter and rate is fixed as a per meter.

qty rate value

100 300/mtr 30000/-

in this case whether I avail 100% in input or 50% in capital goods?

Please let me know


11 Dated: 6-5-2016
By:- KASTURI SETHI

50% of Capital goods.


Page: 1

Old Query - New Comments are closed.

Quick Updates:Latest Updates