Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding
  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram
Discussions Forum
Home Forum Central Excise This

A Public Forum.
Acknowledging the Value of Experts.

Contribute Your Wisdom, Shape the Future.
Let Your Experience Guide Others

Submit new Issue / Query     My IssuesMy Replies
A free service.
You may submit an issue for brainstorming also.

Refund U/s 11B of CEA, 1944, Central Excise

Issue Id: - 113163
Dated: 8-12-2017
By:- GOPAL CHOWDHURY

Refund U/s 11B of CEA, 1944


  • Contents

Dear All,

As we are aware that refund U/s 11B of CEA,1944 is available within one year. The same is also applicable for refund under Rule 5 of CCR'2004.

In this regard I want to know that a company have filed a refund claim where CEx duty was paid on delay submission of proof of export, on export to SEZ unit.

The refund claim was filed after the lapse of 2 years from the date of payment of CEx duty.

We know that Section 11B not permitting this but when the company has paid the CEx duty, they wrote in the letter that duty was provisionally paid due to non submission of proof of export within the time prescribed.

Now I want to know can I take the interpretation that provisionally paid and paid under protest is same in this context.

As duty is eligible to the company but they where delayed in filing the refund claim.

Kindly let me know is it possible to take the stand that provisionally paid is meant as paid under protest. If any case law is there kindly let me know.

Thanks

Posts / Replies

Showing Replies 1 to 1 of 1 Records

Page: 1


1 Dated: 13-5-2018
By:- DR.MARIAPPAN GOVINDARAJAN

Whether the final assessement is made in this case?


Page: 1

Old Query - New Comments are closed.

Quick Updates:Latest Updates