Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding
  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram
Discussions Forum
Home Forum Income Tax This

A Public Forum.
Acknowledging the Value of Experts.

Contribute Your Wisdom, Shape the Future.
Let Your Experience Guide Others

Submit new Issue / Query     My IssuesMy Replies
A free service.
You may submit an issue for brainstorming also.

Consultancy Fees to doctors from firm - treatment, Income Tax

Issue Id: - 118654
Dated: 19-7-2023
By:- Raghavendar S

Consultancy Fees to doctors from firm - treatment


  • Contents

Dear Experts,

A partnership firm (all the partners are doctors) runs a hospital, and paid consultancy fee to partners for their services in the hospital; this consultancy fee is paid apart from allowable remuneration under the income tax act. Is this allowed in the income tax act?

Please refer to any case law, if possible.

Thanks in advance

Posts / Replies

Showing Replies 1 to 3 of 3 Records

Page: 1


1 Dated: 19-7-2023
By:- Charu Tyagi

Consultancy fee as a practicing doctor and remuneration as per partnership deed is allowable and tenable as per law


2 Dated: 19-7-2023
By:- Padmanathan Kollengode

The consultancy fee and remuneration both put together will considered for limit under section 40(b) of IT Act.

In my opinion, the consultancy will also be covered under "remuneration" in section 40(b).

You may also refer to COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX VERSUS PACKWELL (KARNATAKA) INDUSTRIES 2003 (11) TMI 36 - MADRAS High Court.


3 Dated: 19-7-2023
By:- Padmanathan Kollengode

In continuation,

Just reproducing a very important para from above judgement:-

On principle as well, it is not possible to accept the argument that the statutory prohibition is to be ignored or diluted by regarding a partner to whom remuneration is paid as a person who besides being a partner is something more or something different when he deals with the firm. A partner in a firm is very much a partner and it is that status which defines his rights and also imposes on him the obligation to render all the services that he is capable of for the advancement of the objects of the firm. Such a person cannot seek to avoid the effect of the prohibition made in the statute by describing himself as an expert. Any expertise that he may possess is required to be made available to the firm as a partner and even if remuneration therefor is permissible in terms of the partnership deed, nevertheless, having regard to the statutory provision which prevailed until the law was amended in 1992, payment so made cannot be regarded as being items of expenditure so far as the firm is concerned. The question is answered in favour of the Revenue and against the assessee.


Page: 1

Old Query - New Comments are closed.

Quick Updates:Latest Updates