Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding
  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram
Discussions Forum
Home Forum Goods and Services Tax - GST This

A Public Forum.
Acknowledging the Value of Experts.

Contribute Your Wisdom, Shape the Future.
Let Your Experience Guide Others

Submit new Issue / Query     My IssuesMy Replies
A free service.
You may submit an issue for brainstorming also.

COTTON. WRONG PAYMENT OF TAX UNDER FCM., Goods and Services Tax - GST

Issue Id: - 119668
Dated: 1-3-2025
By:- Sadanand Bulbule

COTTON. WRONG PAYMENT OF TAX UNDER FCM.


  • Contents

Dear experts

In terms of Notification No.43/2017-CTR dated 14/11/2017, a registered person is liable to pay tax under RMC on purchase of "Raw cotton from agriculturist" under Section 9[3] of the CGST Act.

However a taxpayer under the influence of misguidance, has paid tax under FCM on supply of such Raw cotton purchased from agriculturists and it is manifest in the books of account and financial statements.

But the Adjudicating Authority has again levied tax/interest/penalty by way of a consolidated order for five years under Section 74 on such purchase under RMC without considering the actual of payment of tax under FCM by the taxpayer.

Although there is procedural lapse, what are adverse revenue implications? And what is the remedy? An appeal under Section 107 or a rectification under Section 161?

Plz clarify.

Post Reply

Posts / Replies

Showing Replies 1 to 4 of 4 Records

Page: 1


1 Dated: 1-3-2025
By:- Sadanand Bulbule

Plz read it as " RCM" instead of RMC.


2 Dated: 1-3-2025
By:- KASTURI SETHI

Sh.Sadanand Bulbule Ji,

                       Sir,  In my opinion, the department will not accept application for rectification of error under Section 161 of CGST Act.

                             The better option is filing of appeal under Section 107. The issue can be contested on the ground that tax cannot be charged twice for the same transaction. (Emphasis is laid on  'same transaction'. 

                            Recently about four months ago I have read judgement  on this issue in favour of the taxpayer.

               


3 Dated: 1-3-2025
By:- Sadanand Bulbule

Yes Sir. But the taxpayer has to deposit 10% of the disputed tax amount to file appeal under Section 107, which is the burning issue.


4 Dated: 1-3-2025
By:- Sadanand Bulbule

Sirji

The situation is like black ice.


Page: 1

Post Reply

Quick Updates:Latest Updates