Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding
  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram
Discussions Forum
Home Forum Central Excise This

A Public Forum.
Acknowledging the Value of Experts.

Contribute Your Wisdom, Shape the Future.
Let Your Experience Guide Others

Submit new Issue / Query     My IssuesMy Replies
A free service.
You may submit an issue for brainstorming also.

Consequences - export during lapse period, Central Excise

Issue Id: - 1207
Dated: 25-5-2009
By:- Narayanan Sethumadhavan

Consequences - export during lapse period


  • Contents

If a manufacturer exporter fails to renew his LUT for 3 months. But he exports goods during the lapse period. He renews the LUT after 3 months. IS there any consequences for the exports made during the particular 3 months ( where the LUT is not convered those 3 months)

Posts / Replies

Showing Replies 1 to 3 of 3 Records

Page: 1


1 Dated: 25-5-2009
By:- Pradeep Khatri

Dear Sir, Export under bond (or LUT) is a major trade- facilitation measure which is allowed as per policy decision on not to export taxes. But furnishing of bond or LUT is one of the essential conditions in the Notification No. 42/2001-CE (N.T.), dated 26-06-2001 issued under Rule 19 of C.E.Rules,2002. It cannot be regarded as merely procedural because, removal of goods without payment of duty cannot be made without safegurding revenue interest in order to prevent mis-use of the facility. For an assessee who is engaged in exports regularly, non-furnishing of bond or LUT cannot be considered as due to ignorance. But such a mistake can be condoned only by bodies like CESTAT. In the case of Eves Fashions v Commissioner [2006 (205) E.L.T. 619 (Tri. - Del.) it was held that duty and penalty confirmed on ground of non-furnishing of bond or letter of undertaking (LUT) was not sustainable when duly attested photocopies of shipping bill(EP-Copy) B/Lading and Foreing Exchange Remittance Certificate or BRC were submitted within 180 days from the date of LEO as mentioned on the S/Bills. Generally, when export is proved duty demand may not sustain. In my opinion submission of proof of export is must and non furnishing of LUT condonable when proof of export provided. Best Regards Pradeep Khatri Indirect Tax Consultant e-mail: - [email protected]


2 Dated: 25-5-2009
By:- Mukesh Kumar
i see no reason to disagree with the views expressed by Mr. Pradeep Khatri.

3 Dated: 12-9-2015
By:- Devang Shah

Sir,

we are LUT renewal lapse two month and during the period we export under without duty paid and LUT number mention on ARE 1 previous LUT number. we are in fault ? if we submit total proof of export document submit excise authority within 180 days. any suggestion or advise to us with any case study regarding said Issue.


Page: 1

Old Query - New Comments are closed.

Quick Updates:Latest Updates