Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding
  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram
Discussions Forum
Home Forum Central Excise This

A Public Forum.
Acknowledging the Value of Experts.

Contribute Your Wisdom, Shape the Future.
Let Your Experience Guide Others

Submit new Issue / Query     My IssuesMy Replies
A free service.
You may submit an issue for brainstorming also.

valuation in jobwork, Central Excise

Issue Id: - 3823
Dated: 16-2-2012
By:- raj kumar shukla

valuation in jobwork


  • Contents

What will be assessable value in case manufacturer is a jobworker manufacturing excisable goods on behalf of principal manufacturer but the principal is not selling the excisable goods but it is being used  by it. accoring to me rule 10A and 10 of valuation rules are not applicable. Rule 8 is most likely rule but for rule 8 needs cost of production. whose cost of production is to be reckoned for the purpose? IS IT JOB WORKER OR PRINCIPAL?

Posts / Replies

Showing Replies 1 to 10 of 10 Records

Page: 1


1 Dated: 16-2-2012
By:- Pradeep Khatri

Since the goods are being used by the principal manufacturer in the further manufacturing of finished goods, therefore, no excise duty will be payable.  You can seek the benefit of Notification No. 214/86 in this matter. 


2 Dated: 17-2-2012
By:- raj kumar shukla

No, the goods are not used in the manufacture of final product. In fact, the principal is not manufacturer but simply uses the same. no excise duty is paid by the principal.In this case how the valuation is to be done?


3 Dated: 17-2-2012
By:- Anil Gagneja

If goods will despatch to exempted areas (i.e. Himachal Pardesh, Uttarakhand) where principal manufacturer unable to give undertaking as per Notification 214/86.

Kindly confirm whether we pay excise duty or not.

 

 

 


4 Dated: 17-2-2012
By:- raj kumar shukla

 job worker is paying duty. principal is just using the resultant goods.For paying duty a/value is to be arrived as there is no transactional value. principal is not a manufacturer.


5 Dated: 17-2-2012
By:- Pradeep Khatri

Duty will be payable on the cost of rawmaterial plus jobwork charges.


6 Dated: 17-2-2012
By:- Anil Gagneja

I agree with Mr. Pardeep Khatri point of view.


7 Dated: 17-2-2012
By:- raj kumar shukla

whose cost of production is to be reckoned for the purpose? IS IT JOB WORKER OR PRINCIPAL?


8 Dated: 17-2-2012
By:- PAWAN KUMAR SHARMA

 

In my opinon, following should be the mentod to calculate Assessable Value.

  • As it is a case of Job Worker,
  • where Price is not the sole consideration, and,
  • also the exisable goods shall be used as Captive consumption by its Principal Manufacturer, 

Hence, the assessable value should be based on cost of production plus 10% i.e. Raw Material Cost + Job Work Charges + 10% of (RM Cost + Job Work Charges).

 


9 Dated: 17-2-2012
By:- raj kumar shukla

ok, but cost of rawmaterial is to be taken as landed cost net of cenvat. landed cost at which place? if it is job worker, how the landed cost is to be computed?


10 Dated: 20-2-2012
By:- PAWAN KUMAR SHARMA

landed cost should be the cost at receiving location i.e. if the material is directly received at Job Worker Location the Raw Material cost including Freight charges and net of cenvat would be the landed cost.


Page: 1

Old Query - New Comments are closed.

Quick Updates:Latest Updates