1986 (5) TMI 173

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... Member (T)]. - On hearing both sides, we observe that the appellants received the impugned order on 9-9-1985. As per the postal receipt, their appeal was received in the Registry on 9-12-1985, i.e. within the prescribed period of three months. The appeal being in time, the application for condonation of delay is infructuous and is dismissed as such. 2. We then heard both sides on merits of t .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... um twenty thousand meters. But these customers buy only a small quantity at a time. The rest of the quantity keeps lying in the appellants factory. The appellants realise interest charges for holding the stock from such customers. The appellants were recovering special checking charges and interest from the respective customers under the label holding incidental charges but they did not declare .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... tive industrial customer. Therefore, there is no question of the price charged for that special sort/quality being an exceptional price. This is so for the simple reason that there is no other normal price for that sort/quality. 4. Secondly, the holding charges for the stock held by the appellants in their factory store-room are nothing but interest on working capital employed by them in their f .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X