1987 (6) TMI 156

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... l Megde, Member (J)].  - As these two applications are by one and the same applicant and the subject matter being identical they are taken up together for consideration. 2. Their prayer in one of the applications is for dispensation with the pre-deposit of Rs. 16,234-05, the Less Charge demanded from them. The prayer in the other application is for dispensation with the pre-deposit of Rs. 9 .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... the Tribunal. 4. Having regard to the submissions made by Shri Punwani, Shri Prabhu, the Departmental Representative, was not called upon to argue. Further, reliefs claimed in the Stay Applications have become infructuous. Suffice, if it is observed that the Customs authorities were not justified in taking action for detention of the goods when the Stay Applications were pending considerati .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... tes on which the applications are listed for hearing and the Tribunal was also warning them that in case they do not get ready they cannot claim any protection against recovery thus ensuring speedy disposal of the Stay Applications and preventing the applicant from adopting diletory tactics. 6. It is hoped that the Department would not resort to coersive steps during the pendency of the stay .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X