Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding
  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram

TMI Blog

Home

1987 (4) TMI 243

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... 4 filed by the Collector of Central Excise, Bombay-I. Under this application, two points of law were framed by the Collector of Central Excise, Bombay-I. But during the course of the arguments on behalf of the Collector, the learned S.D.R. submitted that the only point, which arose out of the Tribunal s order and which required reference, would be reframed as follows : Whether the specific provisions of Rule 173-G(2)(vii) should not have been availed of by the assessee M/s. Parle Products Ltd. in preference to the general provisions of Rule 11 of the Central Excise Rules, 1944 as in force at the relevant time. 2. In support of the revised point of law framed by the Learned Departmental Representative, he submitted that in the order No. .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... y, he submitted that the point of law as revised, may be referred to the Hon ble High Court for clarification. 3. On behalf of the Respondent, the learned Advocate contended that Rule 11 had been deleted. In these circumstances, there would be no practical effect of the Hon ble High Court s ruling on the implementation of Rule 11. Therefore, there was no purpose in making the reference to the High Court as prayed by the Collector. Apart from this, the remedies available to the assessee under Rule 173-G and Rule 11 were not mutually exclusive and it was up to the assessee to choose whichever remedy he liked for seeking the relief. Apart from this, the provisions for seeking refund were now incorporated in Section 11-B of the Central Excise .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... on did not imply that for the grant of refund under Rule 11, the requirements of Rule 173-G(2) should have been satisfied. In fact as held in the Tribunal s order both are separate procedural Rules for availing of relief of duty, the refund of which is due to the assessee. In the first remedy available under Rule 173-G(2), the assessee himself can avail of the relief by taking the credit after he has cancelled the Gate Pass, provided the intimation of the cancellation is given to the Central Excise authorities. In the other case, the assessee has to make a claim to the Asstt. Collector for the refund of the amount involved. It has not been laid down anywhere that in case the mandatory requirements of sending intimation have not been followe .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

 

 

 

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates