9911796707
TMI Blog1988 (2) TMI 253X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... per : S.D. Jha, Vice-President (J)]. - The question for decision in this batch of appeals, arising out of the same impugned order, is benefit of exemption in respect of additional duty (CVD) in terms of Notification 55/75-C.E., dated 1-3-1975 as amended by Notification 62/78-C.E., dated 1-3-1978 or successor Notification 234/82-C.E., dated 1-11-1982 on the goods "Sorbitol" an intermediate drug ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... on of India and Others - 1987 (28) E.L.T. 193 (Bom.), and submitted that the Hon'ble Bombay High Court in Kumar Prabhulal Shah case had held "Sorbitol" solution to be intermediate drugs eligible to benefit of exemption under Notification 55/75-C.E., dated 1-3-1975. He drew particular attention to. para 7 of the decision which recites that an earlier decision in Rakesh Enterprises case was followed ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... tra State though they were not actual manufacturers. 4. Shri Sundar Rajan, JDR submitted that the Bombay .High Court decisions had been challenged before the Division Bench of the Bombay High Court as also in Supreme Court. He also urged that the appellants did not held. L-4 licence for manufacture of drugs. They were only traders. He reiterated the contentions as found in the order of the lower ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X
|
