2010 (1) TMI 374

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... ot be allowed to hold the field. Impugned order set aside and matter remanded back to authority in original for consideration afreash. - 1064 of 2005 - - - Dated:- 7-1-2010 - V.C. Daga and K.K. Tated, JJ. S/Shri S.N. Kantawalla with Brijesh Pathak i/b B.G. Tangsali, for the Petitioner. Shri P.S. Jetly, for the Respondent. [Order]. - P.C. : Heard rival parties. Perused petition .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... ted 22nd September, 2003 produced at Exh. A. 5. Having heard rival parties, the consensus between them is that two contradictory orders in respect of the same petitioner cannot be allowed to hold the field. Thus looking to the consensus between them the impugned orders are set aside and the matter is remanded back to the authority-in-original for consideration afresh keeping all rival contention .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X