TMI Blog2009 (12) TMI 375X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... 962 read with Section 3(3) of the Foreign Trade (Development and Regulation) Act, 1992 on the ground that the car was not in the possession of the importer. Held that- no contravention of section 111(d) of Custom Act, 1962 made out against importer. - C/54/2008 - 1881/2009 - Dated:- 4-12-2009 - Ms. Jyoti Balasundaram, Vice-President Shri C. Dhanasekaran, SDR, for the Appellant. Ms. Nish ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... ving Star Ltd., the company of which the respondent was the Chairman in Sri Lanka, have affirmed that the car was in the possession of the respondent for 4 years. This has not been challenged. Further, even the adjudicating authority has admitted that there is only a technical violation of the Foreign Trade Policy by the subject vehicle not being registered in the name of the respondent. The Commi ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X
|