2010 (4) TMI 430

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... July, 2006. Delay is about 480 days. Direction for filing affidavit was given but no affidavit has been filed within the time stipulated by this Court. In view of the urgency of the matter it is difficult for us to grant further time to file opposition. Some time number of days does not matter in condoning the delay of the application. It is found from the pronouncement of the Apex Court that eve .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... r was ignorant of the consent of order dated 23rd November, 2006 no step was taken to obtain certified copy of the same. In stead of doing the same the petitioner has taken following infructuous and inappropriate steps. On 23rd August, 2007 Customs House caused inquiry and made searches to ascertain whether the department has received the copy of the said order dated July 7, 2006 from CESTAT and C .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... ted May 6, 2008 again requesting the Assistant Registrar to confirm about the serving of the said order dated July 7, 2006. On 9th May, 2008 the Special Investigation Bench sent an office note to the Tribunal Section informing the fact that the department wishes to appeal against the said order and also wishes to move a stay of the said order and in view of the same to take all necessary steps. 2 .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X