9911796707
TMI Blog2009 (1) TMI 460X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... rder of Tribunal. Held that – petitioner having no locus standi to challenge the order of Tribunal in so far as same between Central Excise Authorities and the company. Tribunal order already upheld by the High Court. No situation of payment of reward in case of fresh assessment order, as directed by Tribunal. Petition dismissed. - 33731 of 2006(N), - - - Dated:- 8-1-2009 - S. Siri Jagan, J. ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... ith a direction to make final assessment under rule 9B(5) of the said rules for the period covered under the show cause notice in accordance with law and in the light of the observations made in this judgment. It is stated by the learned counsel for the appellant that the deposit of Rs. 1 crore (Rupees one crore only) made by the assessee may be retained by the Revenue and be adjusted as per the o ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... ppellant that the deposit of Rs. 1 crore (Rupees one crore only) made by the assessee may be retained by the Revenue and be adjusted as per the outcome of the final assessment." Sri. Chandrasekharan, counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that his client is aggrieved by the above order and it is within his rights to challenge the above order. 2. However, I find it difficult to concur wit ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... ertain- able. Reserving the rights of the petitioner to move appropriately in the matter as and when cause of action arises, the writ petition is dismissed.' The petitioner filed W.A. No. 1232/2006 against that judgment. By Ext. P30 judgment, the Division Bench dismissed the writ appeal as lacking in merit. Subsequently, by Ext. P32 order the counsel for The petitioner was informed by the Assist ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X
|
