2010 (4) TMI 468

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... r. - E/31/2010 - 437/2010 - Dated:- 15-4-2010 - Dr. Chittaranjan Satapathy, Member (T) Shri T. Ramesh, Advocate, for the Appellant. Shri T.H. Rao, SDR, for the Respondent. [Order]. - Heard both sides. For the reasons stated in the miscellaneous application for condonation of delay and stay application, the delay in filing the appeal by 30 days is condoned and the requirement of .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... a demand notice issued by the Department. 3. Heard the learned SDR Shri T.H. Rao. 4. After taking into account the submissions from both sides and following the earlier decisions of the Tribunal in the case of CCE, Chandigarh v. Raghav Alloys (P) Ltd. - 2009 (242) E.L.T. 124 and Final Order No. 160/2010 dated 5-2-2010 in Appeal No. E/763/2005 decided by the South Zonal Bench at Chennai, I hold .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X