2010 (4) TMI 475

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... filed against the order dated 11-2-1993 passed by Chief Judicial Magistrate, Amritsar to the extent of awarding inadequate sentence to the respondent after holding her guilty of the offence under Section 135 of the Customs Act, 1962. The trial Court sentenced the respondent for the period already undergone by her in custody, besides paying an amount of Rs. 2,500/- as fine. In default of payment of .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... ntenced to imprisonment for the period already undergone by her in custody, besides paying an amount of Rs. 2,500/- as fine. 4. The impugned order of sentence was passed more than 17 years back. Under Section 135 of the Act, the respondent could have been sentenced to maximum imprisonment for three years. There is no requirement of imposition of any minimum sentence of imprisonment. The responden .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X