1990 (1) TMI 172

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... ation the applicants have prayed for amendment of paragraph 8 of the ROM application. The Misc. Application has been allowed and the arguments of Smt. Wadhwa for the applicants and Miss Mann for the respondent have been heard on the ROM application. Smt. Wadhwa has argued that on 22-5-89, she argued on the question of denial of principles of natural justice inasmuch as the facility of cross-examin .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... the Tribunal. She has argued that such rectification of errors is permissible in view of the provision of Section 35C of the Central Excises & Salt Act, 1944 and also the decisions of the Tribunal reported in 1987 (27) E.L.T. 315 (Tribunal) in the case of M/s. Neelam Tin Industries, Kanpur v. Collector of Central Excise, Kanpur and 1989 (41) E.L.T. 439 (Tri.) in the case of Bhim Sain v. Collector .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X