9911796707
TMI Blog1995 (6) TMI 108X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... ndents. [Order]. - This appeal is directed against the order-in-Appeal No. 1008/90 BCH, dated 5-7-1990 of the Collector of Customs (Appeals), Bombay, confirming the Order-in-Original No. S/10-226/89IV, dated 4-12-1990 of Asst. Collector of Customs, Bombay, ordering confiscation of the goods imported by the appellants with option to pay redemption fine of Rs. 5600/-. 2. The appellants impo ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... held liable to confiscation and impugned order came to be passed, which on appeal was confirmed by the Collector (Appeals). 3. Shri D.S. Moghe, the authorised representative of the appellants submits that the items were imported for R & D purpose which was permissible under the OGL licence No. 5/88 and the condition laid down therein have been duly complied with. In his submission, therefor ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... ort has rightly been held as unauthorised. 5. Considering the submissions made and going through the records and considering the facts, the conditions incorporated in Appx 6 are the conditions covering imports under OGL. They do not say that they will apply to only specific OGL and not to all the OGL issued during the relevant policy period. Further, para 31 is a requirement which is a pre-i ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... or the purpose of statistic as to the import of specific items. Appellants had imported the item for R & D purposes and they are actual users with no profit motive involved. In the circumstances, while sustaining the order of confiscation and imposition of redemption fine, the fine is reduced to from Rs. 5600/- to Rs. 1500/- (Rupees one thousand five hundred only), consequential relief to follow.< ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X
|
