9911796707
TMI Blog1996 (10) TMI 194X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... ondents. [Order per : Shiben K. Dhar, Member (T)]. This appeal is directed against order dated 16-4-1988 of Collector of Customs, Bombay. The appellants imported what they claimed was one Zeiser Ticket and label Printing Machine Model Z-19, with Built-in attachments for numbering and perforating including CODATEST device and one set of spare parts and consumables. Collector of Customs he ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... lso draws our attention to invoice and technical literature placed in the file which clearly indicates that the main machine to be Ticket and Label printing machine. The importer who had recently set up this industry had absolutely no intention to evade any ITC Regulations. He also submits that even though Collector s order refers to show cause notice, no show cause notice in fact was issued to th ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... achments for numbering and perforating including CODATEST device. Ld. Advocate refers to page 8 of the appeal papers and categorically stated that what was imported by them was a machine described therein. The literature placed at page 8 indicates the machine to be Ticket and Label printing machine with numbering attachment. The Bill of entry indicating the examination report is not available as a ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... chine function would not function effectively unless its output was tested with device and therefore, unless this machine was also imported, they would not be able to give guarantee for effective printing of cheques. Since however such a machine with whatever object it might have been imported is not covered under OGL, as considered by the ld. Advocate himself, we hold that this machine required a ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X
|
