1998 (1) TMI 190

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... er per : G.R. Sharma, Member (T)]. Shri M. Chandrasekharan, the ld. Sr. Counsel arguing the Stay petition for dispensing with pre-deposit of duty amounting to Rs. 77,51,520/-, submits that the Respondents have raised this demand on the application filed by the Applicants for permission to destroy the Cigarettes which were found unfit for marketing. He submits that on an earlier occasion in 1 .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... Excise Collectorate did not find the month of manufacture embossed on the cartons of cigarettes, yet there was no allegation in the Show Cause Notice that some cigarettes have been removed and replaced. The ld. Senior Counsel submits that since the goods were still in the Bonded Storeroom, there was no question of demand of duty. He, therefore, prays that pre-deposit of duty demanded may be staye .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X