9911796707
TMI Blog1998 (5) TMI 70X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... eran, Member (J)]. For the purpose of hearing the appeal the appellants are required to deposit Rs. 29,45,491/- and a penalty of Rs. 1,00,000/-. The issue involved in this case is that the appellants are manufacturing processed tyre cord fabric from the raw-material which is known as `Unprocessed Tyre Cord Fabric (Nylon). The same is captively used in the manufacture of tyres. The Departmen ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... its in the similar cases as in the case of Indian Aluminium Cables Ltd. v. CCE as reported in 1998 (97) E.L.T. 507 (Tribunal), 1997 (69) ECR 126 (Tribunal). He submits that even the Supreme Court has considered on similar issue in the case of CCE v. Usha Martin Industries as reported in 1997 (44) E.L.T. 460. With regard to the term appropriate amount of duty has already been paid . This term also ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... e judgments, the prayer of the appellants for early hearing is accepted. 6. Ld. DR submits that similar appeals which are pending to be taken up for hearing together. 7. Ld. Consultant to give a list to the Registry for linking of all the matters of MRF Ltd. pertaining to this issue. In terms of the list to be given by the Consultant is to be listed on 10-7-1998. The appellants to come up for ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X
|
