9911796707
TMI Blog1998 (9) TMI 195X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... e Respondent. [Order per : J.H. Joglekar, Member (T)]. The applicants are Custom House Agent. An employee of theirs was involved in April 1994 in a case booked by the Anti-corruption Wing by the CBI. After the applicant became aware of the involvement of his employee, for four months the employment of the employee had continued. Thereafter an enquiry was conducted by the Central Intellig ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... of the CHA in keeping the employee in his employment for a considerable time after the knowledge of his unlawfulness activity, would indicate that the Commissioner s action was correct. He also submits that it was for the CHA to have informed the Custom House of this action taken by the CBI which he failed to do. He argued that the wording of Regulation 21(2) is the case that in appropriate cases ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... dly be called as immediate. 5. We are therefore, of the view that impugned order does not sustain on the point of law. Since the Commissioner has already commenced the process of revocation of licence, we feel that the main appeal itself in this case can be disposed off. Both the sides having no objection, we do this. We allow the appeal and set aside the impugned order. The applicant undertakes ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X
|
